January 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3419 in pharo: TraitCompositionTest>>testProvidedMethodBindingsWithConflicts is failing

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: Milestone-1.3 Comment #4 on issue 3419 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: TraitCompositionTest>>testProvidedMethodBindingsWithConflicts is failing http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3419 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Jan. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3179 in pharo: Failing Tests for Monticello

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: Milestone-1.3 Comment #3 on issue 3179 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: Failing Tests for Monticello http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3179 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Jan. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Gofer issue

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

Hi Igor, 2011/1/21 Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com>: > On 20 January 2011 22:52, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Following the coventions your name is 'Igor' and the package is on the >>>> branch 'Stasenko'. Gofer proritizes the main branch. >>> >>> how about retrieving the latest version regardless of branch? >>> Can you provide an example how to tell Gofer to load it? >> >> There is no such thing as the latest version in Monticello, unless you >> download all versions and compare the timestamps. >> > > why you saying like that? If i open this repo in monticello browser, i > can clearly see what is the latest > uploaded version. And i sure that MC browser does not downloads all > versions from repository. I didn't checked the source code but it seems MC repository inspector always sort the package list by version number and when you save a package in the Monticello Browser you can edit the version number and write a lower number, then you cannot concede the first in the list is the latest cronologically. I don't know why the version number is editable though. HernÃ¡n

Jan. 21, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3564 in pharo: Comparison of source references (for sorting)

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: johanbri...(a)me.com Labels: Milestone-1.2 New issue 3564 by johanbri...(a)me.com: Comparison of source references (for sorting) http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3564 Not all SourceReference subclasses implement <= Steps to reproduce: 1. search method source with 'CustomMenu' 2. hit bug

Jan. 21, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3563 in pharo: PCCByCompilationTest tests sometimes fail randomly

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: marcus.d...(a)gmail.com Labels: Milestone-1.2 Milestone-1.3 New issue 3563 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: PCCByCompilationTest tests sometimes fail randomly http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3563 PCCByCompilationTest tests sometimes fail randomly

Jan. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3420 in pharo: ReleaseTest>>#testUndeclared is failing

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3420 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: ReleaseTest>>#testUndeclared is failing http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3420 I will for now just try to delete the class in the build script (hehe ;-)

Jan. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3513 in pharo: Failing Test:ClosureTests.testWhileWithTempIsNil

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #1 on issue 3513 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: Failing Test:ClosureTests.testWhileWithTempIsNil http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3513 related to Issue 2360

Jan. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3534 in pharo: LargePositiveInteger(Object)>>error

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Labels: -Milestone-1.2 Milestone-1.3 Comment #4 on issue 3534 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: LargePositiveInteger(Object)>>error http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3534 ok, I move it to 1.3

Jan. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Gofer issue

by Igor Stasenko

On 20 January 2011 22:52, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> Following the coventions your name is 'Igor' and the package is on the >>> branch 'Stasenko'. Gofer proritizes the main branch. >> >> how about retrieving the latest version regardless of branch? >> Can you provide an example how to tell Gofer to load it? > > There is no such thing as the latest version in Monticello, unless you > download all versions and compare the timestamps. > why you saying like that? If i open this repo in monticello browser, i can clearly see what is the latest uploaded version. And i sure that MC browser does not downloads all versions from repository. So, why i can't instruct Gofer to load it? >> okay, i doing: >> >> Gofer new >> Â Â Â Â url: 'http://squeaksource.com/VMMaker'; >> Â Â Â Â package: 'VMMaker-oscog'; >> Â Â Â Â Â resolved >> >> Â an Array(a GoferResolvedReference name: 'VMMaker-oscog-Igor.Stasenko.47') >> >> hmm.. that doesn't looks right, isnt? Because as you said, >> following the coventions author's name is 'Igor' and the package is on the >> Â branch 'Stasenko' > > Obviously you must have 'VMMaker-oscog-Igor.Stasenko.47' in your package cache. > yes, i will upload it shortly. And that strange too, since i told to get the latest version from 'http://squeaksource.com/VMMaker', not from cache. But that probably ok. > For me I get 'VMMaker-oscog-Igor.Stasenko.43', because there are only > two versions of the package 'VMMaker-oscog' in > <http://squeaksource.com/VMMaker>: 'VMMaker-oscog-Igor.Stasenko.43' > and 'VMMaker-oscog-Igor.Stasenko.38'. Looks as expected. > humm.. what about rest VMMaker-oscog* versions? > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Jan. 21, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3534 in pharo: LargePositiveInteger(Object)>>error

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3534 by marianopeck: LargePositiveInteger(Object)>>error http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3534 Torsten, can you check if this is the same bug that Mattew reported to Eliot? It seems the same bug, in such case, it is a Cog bug and Eliot said he was going to release a new VM during the weekend

Jan. 21, 2011