January 2011 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Text Selection problem in 1.2 dev

by Alain Plantec

ProfStef is ok here :) It seems that my explanation I not so clear ... evaluateSelection is to be fixed. I make the slice. Le 31/01/2011 20:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : > Ok! > > Laurent can you fix profStef? > > Stef > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Alain Plantec wrote:

Jan. 31, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] what do we do for OmniBrowser?

by Esteban Lorenzano

I think we need to move OB outside lukas domain. Sadly, lukas now does not have time to do all that wonderful work we are used :( That means we (the community) need some guys to step into, and maintain the packages ourselves. I'm not jumping my self because right now I have more tasks than I can handle, but maybe some one can do it. Lukas, can you provide a list of tasks you see we need to do for getting OB working with 1.2? (I dunno if they are on the tracker, if that's the case, I'm sorry :) ) best, Esteban El 31/01/2011, a las 5:03p.m., StÃ©phane Ducasse escribiÃ³: > Hi guys > > Lukas will not maintain OB for Pharo 1.2 and personnally I will not do it because I do not have the knowledge and the time. > So now this is time to know what do we do for OmniBrowser. I have all my ears open. > > > The first step I would do > - host OB for 1.1 in a repository where we have write access. > - create a configurationOf for OB and save it there > > > Stef

Jan. 31, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] pharo.st should be a permanent domain, I think

by Diogenes Moreira

Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion... On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful > (and it has a .st!) > One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I > would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is > easily doable with an apache configuration. > I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, > and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, > DiÃ³genes, cough, cough) can do the job :) > > Cheers, > Esteban >

Jan. 31, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] TODO 1.2

by Igor Stasenko

On 31 January 2011 19:35, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Can I suggest that we really remove the non show stopper? >> and I'm sorry but we cannot maintain packages we do not know. >> >> Lukas could you integrate the fix I did for OB? > > I suggest that you publish the changes to your own repository. I would > like to keep the code in http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/omnibrowser/ > working in Pharo 1.1. > > I started to fix several of the tools for Pharo 1.2 in > http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/pharo12, but there is so much broken > that I run out of time :-( > Look at this from positive side: many changes means a lot of things fixed! :) > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Jan. 31, 2011

[Pharo-project] [OT] stic'11 streaming?

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, Does anybody knows if STIC'11 will be streaming the talks? Cheers, Esteban

Jan. 31, 2011

[Pharo-project] pharo.st should be a permanent domain, I think

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, DiÃ³genes, cough, cough) can do the job :) Cheers, Esteban

Jan. 31, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3234 in pharo: fold: reduce: Merge

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3234 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: fold: reduce: Merge http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3234 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Jan. 31, 2011

[Pharo-project] what do we do for OmniBrowser?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys Lukas will not maintain OB for Pharo 1.2 and personnally I will not do it because I do not have the knowledge and the time. So now this is time to know what do we do for OmniBrowser. I have all my ears open. The first step I would do - host OB for 1.1 in a repository where we have write access. - create a configurationOf for OB and save it there Stef

Jan. 31, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] About KeyBindings

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I have the impression that Guillermo work is not the same as GlobalKeyBinding but I may be wrong Anyway fernando could I have a look at your code? Because I really want that. Stef On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote: > Hi, recently there were some discussion on implementing KeyBindings for our IDE. > > There are at least 3 frameworks which address this functionality, the > last one mentioned is the work done by Guillermo. > I've implemented another one, for Gaucho. > > From what i understand, the previous work focuses on implementing > GLOBAL keybindings . > Basically adding behavior to HandMorph or PasteUpMorph or the toolbar > ( docking bar) present in the World. > > My implementation is a generic keybinding for any Morph, which can be > applied to any morph. Special cases for the docking bar or the paste > up Morph can be easily implemented following this uniform scheme. > > I didn't have the time to integrate it into Pharo yet, but will do in > one week from now. > > I like to bring up the discussion on which one we should adopt and > integrate into Morphic, points in favor of my approach: > 1) clean > 2) customizable > 3) generic: no special cases > > I believe the other Global keybindings should be a subset of this > generic keybinding mechanism. > > Fernando > > pd: From a previous mail: > > "... > So for example, if you want to delete any Morph from the system > by pressing cmd-w, you have to add the following binding: > > condition := GMCondition > compositeWith: > #( #understandsKeyBindingCommandCondition > #uneditedCondition ) ). > binding := GMKeyBinding > actingOn: $w asciiValue > modifiedBy: #(#command) > satisfying: condition > applying: #close. > m := Morph new. > m addKeyBinding: binding . > ... > " > > pd2: Useful and related comment from Stef > ".. > A classVar Binding and an instance var binding. > **All** the methods only access binding > binding get initialized with the default table defined in Binding > => we can have table binding sharing > => we can have instance based customization. >

Jan. 31, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Text Selection problem in 1.2 dev

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

So alain should I do something? Or just ProfStef should be fixed? Stef > yes, it doesn't work because the fix has been overwritten with old code. > I think that only SmalltalkEditor>>#evaluateSelection has been touched. > Just browse this method, then open versions and set #evaluateSelection back > to its previous version (12/21/2010). > > > > Le 31/01/2011 17:17, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : >> Alain in >> 13033 >> >> Gofer >> ... metacelloRepository >> >> >> (ConfigurationOfProfStef project version: '1.6') load. >> >> ProfStef go >> >> >> >> >>> It seems to me that it has already been reported and fixed a time ago. >>> see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3472 >>> take >>> >>> SLICE-Issue-3472-Text-selection-problem-in-Pharo-dev-12 and >>> SLICE-Issue-3472-Text-selection-problem-in-Pharo-dev-12-Part-2 >>> >>> Cheers >>> Alain >>> >>> Le 31/01/2011 14:23, StÃ©phane Ducasse a Ã©crit : >>>> hi guys >>>> >>>> in 1.2 dev when I play with ProfStef go I get an error after a couple of screens normally 3. >>>> >>>> I do not understand why but it looks really a problem with text selection >>>> >>>> https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/view/Pharo/job/Pharo%201.2/ >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >

Jan. 31, 2011