September 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12143

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

12143 ----- - Issue 2973: PluggableTextMorph styler is not initialized. Thanks Benjamin Van Ryseghem. - Issue 2976: introduced SequenceableCollection >> #indexOf:startingAt:. - Issue 2974: ByteArray indexOf:startingAt: - Issue 2972: cleaner bench printout. - Issue 2970: DateAndTimeTests. - Issue 2967: DoIt on a workspace doesnt work, raises a subscript out of bounds error. Thanks fernando. Stef

Sept. 18, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Category autocomplete

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

yes the problme is that space is taken as a terminator. Stef On Sep 18, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote: > Hi, > when adding a method from the debugger and it ask for the category, if I want to create a category that has the same "starting" words as an existing one, it takes the existing one... is there a way to avoid that? > > Example: > * evaluating --> is a category > * I want to create "evaluating - private" but it takes "evalauting". > > Hernan > > -- > HernÃ¡n Wilkinson > Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching > Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 > email: hernan.wilkinson(a)10Pines.com > site: http://www.10Pines.com > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 18, 2010

[Pharo-project] Category autocomplete

by Hernan Wilkinson

Hi, when adding a method from the debugger and it ask for the category, if I want to create a category that has the same "starting" words as an existing one, it takes the existing one... is there a way to avoid that? Example: * evaluating --> is a category * I want to create "evaluating - private" but it takes "evalauting". Hernan -- * HernÃ¡n Wilkinson Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 email: hernan.wilkinson(a)10Pines.com site: http://www.10Pines.com <http://www.10pines.com/> *

Sept. 18, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Lukas, Clearly you have tried Cog for making images :) How much faster is it? Bill ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [renggli(a)gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:32 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 No the images are built exactly the same way as before. I am looking forward being able to use Cog to build images in the future. Loading Monticello packages is considerably faster with the new VM. For now I don't use the Cog VM on the build server, also because I cannot do coverage analysis with it. Lukas On 18 September 2010 20:20, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu> wrote: > Lukas, > > That's great, and I thought I had read that. But something else you wrote made me doubt that; I must have confused a comment on the speed of the one-clicks at runtime as a statement that they built quickly thanks to Cog (which would make them Cog images). > > Bill > > > ________________________________________ > From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [renggli(a)gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > >> Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images? > > None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click > distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both > VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 18, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1

by Lukas Renggli

No the images are built exactly the same way as before. I am looking forward being able to use Cog to build images in the future. Loading Monticello packages is considerably faster with the new VM. For now I don't use the Cog VM on the build server, also because I cannot do coverage analysis with it. Lukas On 18 September 2010 20:20, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu> wrote: > Lukas, > > That's great, and I thought I had read that. Â But something else you wrote made me doubt that; I must have confused a comment on the speed of the one-clicks at runtime as a statement that they built quickly thanks to Cog (which would make them Cog images). > > Bill > > > ________________________________________ > From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [renggli(a)gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > >> Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Â Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Â Compared to what? Â Are their non-Cog versions of these images? > > None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click > distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both > VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

Sept. 18, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] MethodName is now Finder

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

thanks benjamin we will have a look. This was a cool feeling to see you coding all evenings :) On Sep 18, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Benjamin Van Ryseghem wrote: > Hello everyone ^^ > > After a week in ESUG and thanks to Alain and Tobias, I've improved the Finder tool :) > > To test it, you have to download : > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; > package: 'NullTextStyler'; > load > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; > package: 'DialogItemsChooser'; > load > > and the last but not the least : > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; > package: 'Finder'; > load > > It works only on Pharo 1.2 and you will probably have an error due to an issue about PluggableTextMorph : http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2973 > > To open it, just click World >> Tools >> Finder > > > Ben > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 18, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Lukas, That's great, and I thought I had read that. But something else you wrote made me doubt that; I must have confused a comment on the speed of the one-clicks at runtime as a statement that they built quickly thanks to Cog (which would make them Cog images). Bill ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [renggli(a)gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 2:07 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 > Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images? None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 18, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1

by Lukas Renggli

> Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Â Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Â Compared to what? Â Are their non-Cog versions of these images? None of the images are Cog images, this is just that the one-click distributions include the Cog VM. The images can be opened with both VMs until you save it with a Cog VM for the first time. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch

Sept. 18, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Right, and thanks, but the question is whether or not we have switched over to Cog? Lukas mentioned the one-click images built quickly. Compared to what? Are their non-Cog versions of these images? ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Sven Van Caekenberghe [sven(a)beta9.be] Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 12:43 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN 1.1] Pre-built core 1.1.1 On 18 Sep 2010, at 18:28, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > I don't quite get the Hudson web interface yet. Pharo seemed like the place to go, but maybe it's the core? Then downstream of that are Development and others - that looks like it - hidden right under my nose :) But now I arguably have the problem of seeing only a one-click for Pharo dev and Seaside. Are they Cog-only images? Goto http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Development/ or http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Seaside%203.0/ and download the xxx-OneClick.zip artifact. Sven _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 18, 2010

[Pharo-project] MethodName is now Finder

by Benjamin Van Ryseghem

Hello everyone ^^ After a week in ESUG and thanks to Alain and Tobias, I've improved the Finder tool :) To test it, you have to download : Gofer new squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; package: 'NullTextStyler'; load Gofer new squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; package: 'DialogItemsChooser'; load and the last but not the least : Gofer new squeaksource: 'PharoTaskForces'; package: 'Finder'; load It works only on Pharo 1.2 and you will probably have an error due to an issue about PluggableTextMorph : http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2973 To open it, just click World >> Tools >> Finder Ben

Sept. 18, 2010