April 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] 1.0 One-Click image

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Michael Roberts <mike(a)mjr104.co.uk> wrote: > another quick comment, something i have noticed for a while - > > SystemVersion current has a very old date in it. do we want to update > it? i don't think we have ever discussed it in our process. i think it > just used for printing out in logs. it doesn't really matter for 1.0. > but i just had a quick look to check the version string had been > updated. > > True...I have just checked. When I build dev images, I only set SystemVersion current version: 'XXX' but nothing else...should set do something like this too: SystemVersion current version: 'zzz'; date: Date today. ? Cheers MAriano thanks, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] 1.0 One-Click image

by Michael Roberts

also ... ;-) we locked down the update stream because IIRC we discussed it being undefined for the Pharo image. Preferences showUpdateOptionInWorldMenu --> false however, this is now our 1.0 release. we are happy to push this out without any ability for users to update it? the core and pharo (dev) images can have their own sections in the update.list. we could define two separate sections and then we leave ourselves open to push updates out to Pharo 1.0 if we want to? or are we just going to push out updates to PharoCore 1.0 at this stage in our process? i imagined such an update to Pharo 1.0 would be a carefully crafted metacello/gofer script. thanks. enough questions for now! Mike

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] 1.0 One-Click image

by Michael Roberts

another quick comment, something i have noticed for a while - SystemVersion current has a very old date in it. do we want to update it? i don't think we have ever discussed it in our process. i think it just used for printing out in logs. it doesn't really matter for 1.0. but i just had a quick look to check the version string had been updated. thanks, Mike

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] 1.0 One-Click image

by Adrian Lienhard

Hi Mike, Thanks for checking. Yes the URL is correct but the new version of the website is not online yet, so the link does not work yet. Cheers, Adrian On Apr 14, 2010, at 23:23 , Michael Roberts wrote: > Hi Marcus,Adrian, great! > > is the url correct in the workspace ? > www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-0 > > it just links to the download page rather than the release notes... > > thanks, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] 1.0 One-Click image

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Michael Roberts <mike(a)mjr104.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Marcus,Adrian, great! > > is the url correct in the workspace ? > www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-0 > > it just links to the download page rather than the release notes... > > Thanks for reporting. Yes, it is correct. But it is password protected until the release is done ;) It is a surpriseeeee :) Cheers Mariano > thanks, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] 1.0 One-Click image

by Michael Roberts

Hi Marcus,Adrian, great! is the url correct in the workspace ? www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-0 it just links to the download page rather than the release notes... thanks, Mike

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Minimum Class set ...

by Michael Roberts

2010/4/14 James Ladd <james_ladd(a)hotmail.com>: > Hi All, > > As I continue to translate Pharo to Java as part of the Redline project I > wonder, > what is the minimum set of classes and methods I need to implement? ...it probably depends on what image you want to run. Are you going to bootstrap or trace an image by hand, or reuse one that already exists? > I ask this because when I go through all the methods in Object I see a lot > that > I don't think I need to enable the Compiler to work. > > Would it be ok to just include those classes and methods that are defined in > the Smalltalk-80 Language and it implementation (Blue) book, and the > primitives? ...if you wanted to run a Smalltalk-80 image, i guess the answer would be yes. do you have one? for ideas you could also look at Ian Piumarta's Cola work [1], which has a st-80 class library [2] and an example VM [3]. I haven't looked at it for a while, but you see in the svn view a familiar looking mini.image. cheers, Mike [1] http://piumarta.com/software/cola/ [2] http://piumarta.com/svn2/idst/trunk/object/st80/ [3] http://piumarta.com/svn2/idst/trunk/object/examples/sqvm/

April 14, 2010

[Pharo-project] Issue 2308 is fixed

by Torsten Bergmann

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2308 -- GRATIS fÃ¼r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11314 : textEditor from CUIS

by Fernando olivero

Lukas, it's because i assumed shout was installed in the image. For pretty printing the code in the subclasses of TextMorph. I think you could start by taking a look at EntryFieldMorph and using it for implementing the rename refactoring single line entry field. Fernando On Apr 14, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Also I have 3 new tests failing: all because of a reference to the > Shout syntax highlighting framework. > > Lukas >

April 14, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11314 : textEditor from CUIS

by Fernando olivero

You could use this to start EntryFieldMorph>>example1 NewTextMorph>>example1 Fernando On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > how can you test/use it ? > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:51 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > [update 1.1] #11315 > 11315 > ----- > > > - Issue 1225: Harvest textEditor from Squeak. Thanks Fernando. Once more now with the textEditor Classes. Sorry for the mess > > Now we should debug it. > > > Stef > On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > > > This is so cool. I will give a try. > > > > Thanks Fernando, Juan and Stef for making this possible. > > > > Lukas > > > > On 14 April 2010 14:21, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >> 11314 > >> ----- > >> > >> - Merge gofer > >> - Issue 1225: Harvest textEditor from Squeak. Thanks Fernando. > >> > >> > >> Now we should debug it. So please use them and we will find and fix the bugs. > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Lukas Renggli > > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > <ATT00001..txt>

April 14, 2010