March 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11289

by Mariano Martinez Peck

The thing is that those updates may take more than one hour in a non new pc without 10gb of internet. And if you work with older versions of the core, then you have problems trying to merge...as we already experimented that. On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:07 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > marcus some guys always want more .... > > ;) > > > After all the hashing changes would be cool to have a new image in > gforge :) > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> > wrote: > > 11289 > > ----- > > > > Issue 296: Logo inside Pharo window should be locked ... > > Issue 2196: Better cleanupForProduction > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

March 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11290

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

coool! I can tell that trying to fill up chilean document form that you do not really understand is not fun :( So have fun for two. ;) Stef On Mar 23, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > 11290 > ----- > > Issue 2160: Removal of requires calculation code > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

March 23, 2010

[Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11290

by Marcus Denker

11290 ----- Issue 2160: Removal of requires calculation code -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11289

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

marcus some guys always want more .... ;) > After all the hashing changes would be cool to have a new image in gforge :) > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > 11289 > ----- > > Issue 296: Logo inside Pharo window should be locked ... > Issue 2196: Better cleanupForProduction

March 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Major shrinks

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> You didn't understand me. When not to call it agressiveClean instead of having a fac.. boolean and having to do > aBoolean ifTrue: [ blah blag] ifFalse: [ blah blah blah] > > There is something I don't see ? I would have: > > cleanUp > > agressiveCleanUp > > where this last one, may call cleanUp too > discuss with luc and indeed it looks a bit over-engineered for what it does. CleanUp and cleanUp are not connected have a look at the logic. We are not bound to stick with it. If you have something better we can change without any problem. Stef

March 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11289

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 23, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > After all the hashing changes would be cool to have a new image in gforge :) > will do... a releaseclean makes sense, too. Marcus > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > 11289 > ----- > > Issue 296: Logo inside Pharo window should be locked ... > Issue 2196: Better cleanupForProduction > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Move MetaObjectTools from core to PharoDev

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Why not? What would be good is to clean a bit the code of ObjectAsMethodWrapper May be having a better package name can help. Stef > Stef, I was thinking to put not only ProtocolCatcher but also all your stuff from ObjectAsMethodWrapper in the same ObjectMetaTools. > > That way we have a repository with cool stuff > > what do you think ? > > cheers > > Mariano > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:44 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Thanks I will do that! > can you open a ticket because the list is starting to get long of the stuff to integrate after martin's changes. > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2180 > > BTW did you check if the other class besides ProtocolCatcher are working? > > > No. No time yet. > > > Stef > > On Mar 20, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > This package should be removed from core but it should still be loadable. Thus, when needed, they can be easily installed. On the other hand, it could be in PharoDev image. > > > > - MetaObjectTools: This package is moved to PharoDev. It doesnt have any users in PharoCore > > > > To fix, evaluate: > > > > (MCPackage named: 'ObjectMetaTools') unload. > > > > I created and put such code in http://www.squeaksource.com/ObjectMetaTools > > > > To load it again in a Pharo image: > > > > Gofer new > > squeaksource: 'ObjectMetaTools'; > > package: 'ObjectMetaTools'; > > load. > > > > During the week I will analyze the CUIS' ProtocolCatcher and see if it make sense to put it there too. > > > > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

March 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11289

by Mariano Martinez Peck

After all the hashing changes would be cool to have a new image in gforge :) On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>wrote: > 11289 > ----- > > Issue 296: Logo inside Pharo window should be locked ... > Issue 2196: Better cleanupForProduction > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

March 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Major shrinks

by Marcus Denker

On Mar 23, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > In 1.1, I get 7.6MB. > > -> I added cleanUpForRelease as the last call before deleting the package in cleanUpForProduction. > -> I added the code code to empty the changeset after that. > > (I will put these fixes with Mariano's and Noury's (related to the logo) into the release today) > > Cleaning the changesets is *important* as they hold on to a lot of stuff... > In 11289: ScriptLoader new cleanUpForProduction -->7.6 MB Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 23, 2010

[Pharo-project] [update 1.1] #11289

by Marcus Denker

11289 ----- Issue 296: Logo inside Pharo window should be locked ... Issue 2196: Better cleanupForProduction -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

March 23, 2010