December 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build

by Yanni Chiu

On 16/12/10 12:55 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > Ok, I will do that. In addition, it would be nice if the zip would contain inside some version number or date or something. There's a link "See the list of available environment variables" in the configuration of each Hudson job. Part of the list is: ==== The following variables are available to shell scripts BUILD_NUMBER- The current build number, such as "153" BUILD_ID - The current build id, such as "2005-08-22_23-59-59" (YYYY-MM-DD_hh-mm-ss) JOB_NAME - Name of the project of this build, such as "foo" BUILD_TAG - String of "hudson-${JOBNAME}-${BUILD_NUMBER}". Convenient to put into a resource file, a jar file, etc for easier identification. WORKSPACE - The absolute path of the workspace. ====

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Dynamic Arrays view index at execution

by flebber

Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote: > > > > Den 16.12.2010 14:48, skrev flebber: >> HI >> >> doing the pharo tutorial and I wanted to know how pharo viewed the >> dynamic >> array at index 3(seems smalltalk starts at 1 not 0) >> >> >From the xample simple enough >> { (2+3) . (6*6) . 'hello', ' Stef'} size. 3 >> >> from the strings example we found index by >> >> 'ProfStef' at: 1. $P >> >> so I thought { (2+3) . (6*6) . 'hello', ' Stef'} at 3. would let me know >> what the array was evaluated to after execution but it doesn't. Is it >> confused because it doesn't know whether I want the third array element >> or >> the third character? >> >> Led me to wonder the correct way if doing this, so that I could evaluate >> array 1 * 2. >> >> { (2+3) . (6*6) . 'hello', ' Stef'} at 1 * at 2. 180 >> >> >> Cheers > > What do you mean? > The dynamic array is created with three elements, > 5 (2+3) at index 1, > 36 (6*6) at index 2, and > 'hello Stef' ('hello', ' Stef') at index 3. > > at: 3 thus returns the string. > at 3 is invalid, as it is basically 2 method calls, array does not > understand a message called #at, and #3 is an invalid selector anyways. > > For your second expression, writing > ({ (2+3) . (6*6) . 'hello', ' Stef'} at: 1) * (at: 2) would not work, > as you're missing the receiver for the second at: call. > you'd need to do something like: > array := { (2+3) . (6*6) . 'hello', ' Stef'}. > (array at: 1) * (array at: 2). 180 > > Cheers, > Henry > > > > > Yes so simply if at 1 returns the first element of a string, what returns the third element of dynamic array, do you have to assign a varaible for the array to be able to retrieve elements? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Dynamic-Arrays-view-index-at-execution-tp3090891p3091… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: Mac App Store opens January 6

by Esteban Lorenzano

Well, as a first step, just push the current versions of pharo, squeak, etoys, etc. will be fine. In the future, I would like to push some "ready to use" vm + [the distribution you like], some kind the one clicks distributions (but without the other platforms stuff, of course : ). Also, I think there are some guideliness to follow for the applications to be on the app store. I can't say if we already fulfill the requirements, because my developers program for mac expired last month and I forgot to renew it -I'm doing it now, but as I'm at the **s of the world, it is not so automatic :) ) cheers, Esteban El 16/12/2010, a las 4:31p.m., Eliot Miranda escribiÃ³: > So we should be ready to provide Squeak, Pharo, Etoys et al on the Mac App Store on 6/1/2011. John, any advice or should I just go ahead and submit Cog and Squeak 4.1 trunk and see what happens? Other cautions suggestions anybody? > > best > Eliot > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Apple Developer <noreply-appledev(a)apple.com> wrote: > > > > We are thrilled to announce that on January 6 the Mac App Store will open to millions of users around the world. By bringing the revolutionary App Store experience to Mac OS X, the Mac App Store makes discovering, purchasing, and downloading Mac apps easier than ever, and provides you with the best place to distribute your Mac apps. > Submit Your Mac Apps by December 31 > Be a part of the grand opening of the Mac App Store and take advantage of this exciting opportunity to reach new customers. Build, test, and compile your apps with Xcode 3.2.5, then submit them for review no later than Friday, December 31 at 5 PM PST. > As a reminder, iTunes Connect will be shutdown from December 23 - 28. During this time you will not be able to submit apps to the App Store. > > > TM and copyright Â© 2010 Apple Inc. 1 Infinite Loop, MS 83-DM, Cupertino, CA 95014. > All Rights Reserved / Keep Informed / Privacy Policy / My Info > You are receiving this email because you are a Mac Developer Program member who is opted-in to receive marketing or technical information. If you would prefer not to receive future communications from Apple Developer you may unsubscribe. > > > >

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Great!! ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker [marcus.denker(a)inria.fr] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:20 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build On Dec 16, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > ok, I'm sold. Do you have a plan to advertise the Hudson server on the download page? Yes, I think as "daily build". So we have 1. Release 2. Latest unstable. That one lags ca. 10 updates to 3. daily build Where 1 and 2 are archived, 3 not (and can actually change even multiple times a day).

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build

by Marcus Denker

On Dec 16, 2010, at 10:03 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > ok, I'm sold. Do you have a plan to advertise the Hudson server on the download page? Yes, I think as "daily build". So we have 1. Release 2. Latest unstable. That one lags ca. 10 updates to 3. daily build Where 1 and 2 are archived, 3 not (and can actually change even multiple times a day). > ________________________________________ > From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker [marcus.denker(a)inria.fr] > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:23 PM > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build > > On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > >> Marcus, >> >> What about an archive of previous releases? > > Yes, of course. We will continue to use gforge for keeping a copy of every official release *and* a core all 10-20 updates. > > These zip files will of course have the full version number in the file name. > > e.g. for 1.2, I will put the one-click beta on gforge this weekend (with a link on pharo-project.org) > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Test Anything Protocol

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Noting that this is described as a protocol, I started to ask what any transport might be, and whether that could be abused??? Lots of dead links, so it was not clear whether this involves sockets. All I found so far is what looks like a way to format test results, which sounds harmless and potentially helpful. ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of csrabak(a)bol.com.br [csrabak(a)bol.com.br] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:20 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: [Pharo-project] Test Anything Protocol Folks, I'm readying a proposal and came across this, which at first seemed as joke, then a typo or placeholder for some other item in the spec, then I learned it exists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_Anything_Protocol http://testanything.org/ Do you think Pharo would profit supporting this? -- Cesar Rabak

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

ok, I'm sold. Do you have a plan to advertise the Hudson server on the download page? ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker [marcus.denker(a)inria.fr] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:23 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Marcus, > > What about an archive of previous releases? Yes, of course. We will continue to use gforge for keeping a copy of every official release *and* a core all 10-20 updates. These zip files will of course have the full version number in the file name. e.g. for 1.2, I will put the one-click beta on gforge this weekend (with a link on pharo-project.org)

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build

by Marcus Denker

On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Marcus, > > What about an archive of previous releases? Yes, of course. We will continue to use gforge for keeping a copy of every official release *and* a core all 10-20 updates. These zip files will of course have the full version number in the file name. e.g. for 1.2, I will put the one-click beta on gforge this weekend (with a link on pharo-project.org) > Is there any way to come back a year from now to get 1.1.1 or 1.2 as they were originally released? 1.1.1 might be unfair because it came long before you set up the server, but hopefully you see where I am going. It might be nice if the various releases were named in a way that someone could find them for use in debugging, etc. > > Bill > > > > > ________________________________________ > From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker [marcus.denker(a)inria.fr] > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:20 PM > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Development > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build > > On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: >> >>> Is the server building 1.1 or 1.1.1? >> >> 1.1.1 >> >> But I don't want to have that in the name of the Build Target, as this then would need to be renamed for 1.1.2 >> (and doing such point releases now has virtualy an overhead of 0, I should add). >> > > The .zip should have an un-changing name for 1.1, too, so people can just download and get the latest *even* > if we do a 1.1.2. > > But *inside* the zip, I would like to have more infos... > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Dec. 16, 2010

[Pharo-project] Test Anything Protocol

by csrabak＠bol.com.br

Folks, I'm readying a proposal and came across this, which at first seemed as joke, then a typo or placeholder for some other item in the spec, then I learned it exists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_Anything_Protocol http://testanything.org/ Do you think Pharo would profit supporting this? -- Cesar Rabak

Dec. 16, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Marcus, What about an archive of previous releases? Is there any way to come back a year from now to get 1.1.1 or 1.2 as they were originally released? 1.1.1 might be unfair because it came long before you set up the server, but hopefully you see where I am going. It might be nice if the various releases were named in a way that someone could find them for use in debugging, etc. Bill ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker [marcus.denker(a)inria.fr] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:20 PM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Development Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > >> Is the server building 1.1 or 1.1.1? > > 1.1.1 > > But I don't want to have that in the name of the Build Target, as this then would need to be renamed for 1.1.2 > (and doing such point releases now has virtualy an overhead of 0, I should add). > The .zip should have an un-changing name for 1.1, too, so people can just download and get the latest *even* if we do a 1.1.2. But *inside* the zip, I would like to have more infos... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Dec. 16, 2010