December 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] A pass on bugs of 1.2 and 1.2-Dev

by Marcus Denker

On Dec 19, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Luc Fabresse wrote: > Hi all, > > I made a pass on failing tests. > I fixed some: #3415 #3455 #3456 I will do a core update now... > I report #3454 in 1.2-dev : DNU when looking for implementors in OBrowser > > #Luc -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Dec. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] preamble in ChangeSet and ChangeRecord

by Igor Stasenko

On 19 December 2010 15:18, Max Leske <maxleske(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks > > What exactly is the purpose of the preamble in ChangeSet and ChangeRecord? I believe they are not the same for both objects but I haven't been able to figure out what the content of a preamble might actually be. My guess would be that it contains either a comment or a doIt that can check prerequisites. you can put any valid smalltalk code into preamble. Usually i adding it to make sure that when .cs loads, the first things it does - evaluating some stuff in preamble.. like Object become:nil :) > > Maybe you could give me an example of how the respective preambles would be used. > > Thanks, > Max > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Dec. 19, 2010

[Pharo-project] [Hudson] Changes

by Marcus Denker

I did some more small incremental changes to the Hudson setup: - Names of the build artitfacts changend (both 1.1 and 1.2) Core: PharoCore-1.2.zip, PharoCore-1.2.changes / PharoCore-1.2.image Full: Pharo-1.2.zip, PharoOneClick1.2.zip and Pharo-1.2.changes / Pharo-1.2.changes.image - zip of image/changes does not contain the build script anymore - One-Click has now the version number in the .app directory name The direkt links (unchanging from now on) are: https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.2/lastSuccessfu… https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%201.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/… https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%201.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/… -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Dec. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [Progress Report] Zinc HTTP Components

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Hey Philippe, On 18 Dec 2010, at 17:20, Philippe Marschall wrote: > Is the response static or do you allocate a byte array for every > response? Despite everything this benchmark is CPU limited. You were right: I added caching (reuse on repeated requests) on repeated requests to my /bytes handler and I can now match your results on my machine (development image, interactive machine load): [sven@voyager:~]$ ab -k -n 10000 -c 10 http://127.0.0.1:1701/bytes/16384 This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $> Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking 127.0.0.1 (be patient) Completed 1000 requests Completed 2000 requests Completed 3000 requests Completed 4000 requests Completed 5000 requests Completed 6000 requests Completed 7000 requests Completed 8000 requests Completed 9000 requests Completed 10000 requests Finished 10000 requests Server Software: Zinc Server Hostname: 127.0.0.1 Server Port: 1701 Document Path: /bytes/16384 Document Length: 16384 bytes Concurrency Level: 10 Time taken for tests: 4.319 seconds Complete requests: 10000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Keep-Alive requests: 10000 Total transferred: 165610000 bytes HTML transferred: 163840000 bytes Requests per second: 2315.37 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 4.319 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 0.432 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 37446.17 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 Processing: 0 4 1.6 4 30 Waiting: 0 4 1.5 4 27 Total: 0 4 1.6 4 30 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 4 66% 5 75% 5 80% 5 90% 6 95% 7 98% 8 99% 9 100% 30 (longest request) Benchmarking is indeed fun (and very dangereous and a time sink). Sven

Dec. 19, 2010

[Pharo-project] preamble in ChangeSet and ChangeRecord

by Max Leske

Hi folks What exactly is the purpose of the preamble in ChangeSet and ChangeRecord? I believe they are not the same for both objects but I haven't been able to figure out what the content of a preamble might actually be. My guess would be that it contains either a comment or a doIt that can check prerequisites. Maybe you could give me an example of how the respective preambles would be used. Thanks, Max

Dec. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Calling Cli programs

by Luc Fabresse

Hi, You can use OSProcess alone or through CommandShell (built on the top of OSProcess) to execute command lines. Search in the mailing list archive to find help on these packages. Hope this help, #Luc 2010/12/19 flebber <flebber.crue(a)gmail.com> > > Hi easy question, but google isn't seeming to give me the right search > results for this. What do I need to read up on when trying to run an > external cli program from within smalltalk. > > For example I wanted to take a file and pass it to X264 on the command > line. > > Command Such as; > > x264 [options] -o outfile infile [widthxheight] > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Calling-Cli-programs-tp3094384p3094384.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Dec. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3445 in pharo: [Repackage] "SUnit" should be well structured

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3445 by Torsten....(a)astares.de: [Repackage] "SUnit" should be well structured http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3445 There is nothing in the changeset that should make 1.2 unstable. However - if you want we can defer it to 1.3. The help package is in work anyway. The failing SUnit tests are fixed BTW (see http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3415)

Dec. 19, 2010

[Pharo-project] A pass on bugs of 1.2 and 1.2-Dev

by Luc Fabresse

Hi all, I made a pass on failing tests. I fixed some: #3415 #3455 #3456 I report #3454 in 1.2-dev : DNU when looking for implementors in OBrowser #Luc

Dec. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3455 in pharo: Some SystemNavigationTests failed in 1.2-Dev

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3455 by luc.fabresse: Some SystemNavigationTests failed in 1.2-Dev http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3455 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Dec. 19, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3456 in pharo: ENH SUnit ClassFactoryForTestCase

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 3456 by luc.fabresse: ENH SUnit ClassFactoryForTestCase http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3456 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Dec. 19, 2010