December 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] marketing or not?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Dec 23, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Chip Nowacek wrote: > > If it's not just marketing, what, in your view, might be the ramifications? Could we (people in this community) make business around that. I mean lot of communitees are good at creating buzz and smalltalkers in general not that much. Stef > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/marketing-or-not-tp3161726p3161755.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 2010 - Thank you!

by GermÃ¡n Arduino

2010/12/23 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > > On Dec 23, 2010, at 1:14 AM, GermÃ¡n Arduino wrote: > >> Ey, I want join also to the feelings of Sven and Laurent. >> >> I'm in Smalltalk from year 2000 aproximately but only in the last >> years I'm achieving one of my goals that is work 100% in Smalltalk in >> my small entrepreneurship dream called Arduino Software. A big part of >> this history is thanks to Pharo and Seaside and lot of other cool >> stuff on squeaksource. >> >> I think that the business orientation of Pharo was a key factor to >> caught my attention and, even when I also love Squeak and its people >> (a lot of us are on both sides trying to help) I have now in Pharo the >> tools to fight in the commercial arena. > > excellent news. I'm happy for you. > Thanks! >> >> Modestly I try to help in the areas I can and in the time I have and >> want to say here a big big thanks to a lot of people working hard and >> (as Stef said) not only in the cool part of development but also on >> more boring (but needed stuff) as admin, doc, etc. >> >> Thank you all dear fellow of Pharo/Seaside/etc community by the effort >> put in this work and for the help I received each time I needed it. >> And also a BIG thanks to ESUG by the continuos effort to help in the >> Smalltalk advance. >> >> Now we must go for more in 2011, for example in develop the next big >> success on the startups market, this one with Pharo :) > > do you think that a good open-source ERP in Smalltalk would help you? > > Is not exactly in what I'm thinking but I'm sure that is a need in lot of small and medium companies here. Is a new Pharo project?

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3271 in pharo: r isLiteralSymbol: #<= is broken

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3271 by stephane.ducasse: r isLiteralSymbol: #<= is broken http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3271 Tx guillermo. Did you run all the tests?

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] marketing or not?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

what I want to say is that we could play the same game surfing in the hype of javascript. People like jump into javascript like they did in Java and it would be good to take benefit of that. Stef On Dec 23, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Looks cool, except that they have to restart the server after a code-change :-) > > Lukas > > On 23 December 2010 08:32, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> http://www.Ajax.org >> >> >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch >

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3455 in pharo: Some SystemNavigationTests failed in 1.2-Dev

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #4 on issue 3455 by marcus.denker: Some SystemNavigationTests failed in 1.2-Dev http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3455 in build starting 23.12.2010

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3447 in pharo: Do we need to menu entry "Shout Workspace"?

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #7 on issue 3447 by marcus.denker: Do we need to menu entry "Shout Workspace"? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3447 in build starting 23.12.2010

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2611 in pharo: DNU when clicking on active text in class comment

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #9 on issue 2611 by marcus.denker: DNU when clicking on active text in class comment http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2611 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Tests for XMLWriter?

by jaayer

---- On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:17:25 -0800 jaayer wrote ---- > > > > >---- On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 05:33:44 -0800 Alexandre Bergel wrote ---- > >>Hi! >> >>Ivan and I tried to use XMLWriter yesterday, but without tests it is a bit cryptic. Are the tests of XMLWriter available somewhere? >> >>Cheers, >>Alexandre >>-- >>_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > >Unfortunately, the tests that exist for it are in XML-Tests-Parser-Nodes, which still needs to be rewritten, back from when it was still part of the XMLParser package. Are you having trouble figuring out how to use it? Other than the class comment, try looking at XMLParserElementFactory>>sampleUserXML for an example of its use. That should be XMLParserElementFactoryTest>>sampleUserXML > >> >> >> >> >> >>

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] marketing or not?

by Chip Nowacek

If it's not just marketing, what, in your view, might be the ramifications? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/marketing-or-not-tp3161726p3161755.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dec. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [OT] Re: Why Smalltalk ? Which Smalltalk ?

by Douglas Brebner

On 22/12/2010 23:24, Igor Stasenko wrote: > guys, lets just stop pouring oil into the flames because it will burn > people in both camps, without any benefit to anyone. > > I am equivalently happy to see any good news about Squeak as well as > Pharo. Come on, there is enough space in boat for both of them, > not saying about other dialects. > Agreed. I for one am pleased that both Pharo and Squeak exist (and Cuis too!) since it allows different people with different priorities to work in different directions without stepping on each others toes. And, it's not like code developed in one system is automatically non-portable to the others :)

Dec. 23, 2010