December 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3375 in pharo: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #7 on issue 3375 by rydier: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3375 @5: "fileInSilentlyAnnouncing: doesn't invoke methods from *System-Changes." What are you talking about? It uses both nextChunk, checkForPreamble:, and skipStyleChunk

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3298 in pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Object >> #cannotReturn

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3298 by marianopeck: [Kernel Dependencies] Object >> #cannotReturn http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3298 the method is #cannotReturn: not #cannotReturn

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3375 in pharo: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #6 on issue 3375 by stephane.ducasse: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3375 No don't worry we are doing that all the time :)

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3307 in pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] CompiledMethodTrailer>>#encodeUsingZip CompiledMethodTrailer>>#decodeZip

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3307 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] CompiledMethodTrailer>>#encodeUsingZip CompiledMethodTrailer>>#decodeZip http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3307 fix Attachments: Issue3307CompiledMethodTrailerReomveDependenciesToZipReadStreamAndZipWriteStream.1.cs 1.2 KB

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3305 in pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Integer Extension

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3305 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Integer Extension http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3305 fix Attachments: Issue3305IntegerRemoveDependenceToUIManager.1.cs 465 bytes

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3304 in pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Process Extension

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3304 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: [Kernel Dependencies] Process Extension http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3304 Same issue that : Issue 3378: Process remove depende to UIManager Sorry

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3375 in pharo: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #5 on issue 3375 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3375 @Comment 2 and Comment 3: You're right, here the new cs. @Comment 4 : fileInSilentlyAnnouncing: doesn't invoke methods from *System-Changes. That's true that there is dependencies between Compiler-Kernel and System-Changes, but I can fix dependencies only step by step :) (and I hope I will not be the only Pharo user who will fix such issues) Attachments: Issue3375PositionableStreamRemoveDependenceToCompiler.1.cs 1.6 KB

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3375 in pharo: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3375 by rydier: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3375 BTW, methods used by fileInSilentlyAnnouncing: , as well as fileIn, fileInAnnouncing: (which also reference Compiler) etc. are already in *System-Changes. So with these changes we will have a dependency of Kernel-Compiler on System-Changes, as well as no single category containing all fileIn-related methods.

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3375 in pharo: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3375 by rydier: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3375 Ie why not just move both methods to the extension category?

Dec. 3, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3375 in pharo: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #2 on issue 3375 by rydier: PositionableStream remove dependence to Compiler http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3375 So you're moving fileInSilentlyAnnouncing: to Compiler-Kernel, but keeping fileInSilently in Collections-Streams and give it an "Does compiler exist"-check? This does not consistently make sense to me...

Dec. 3, 2010