November 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3254 in pharo: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #7 on issue 3254 by stephane.ducasse: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3254 lukas we are just two releases beyond I thought it was much more :).

Nov. 13, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3254 in pharo: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #6 on issue 3254 by stephane.ducasse: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3254 We should merge the versions of lukas then. I agree with you alain we want regex to be used to simply a lot of old code.

Nov. 13, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3254 in pharo: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #5 on issue 3254 by stephane.ducasse: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3254 We should merge the versions of lukas then. I agree with you alain we want regex to be used to simply a lot of old code.

Nov. 13, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3254 in pharo: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3254 by aplantec: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3254 no, don't remove it from the core. I'm using it for Editor cleaning and improvements. a repackaging problem is not a good reason to remove a package from the core.

Nov. 13, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3254 in pharo: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #3 on issue 3254 by renggli: [Repackage] "Regular expressions" should be well structured http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3254 Please note that this package is coming from VisualWorks and in the past 10 years there were new improved versions released every couple of years. Also note that Pharo is already behind the latest ported and improved code available in <http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/unsorted/>. So "well structuring" the package likely does not do much good in this situation. Maybe it would be better to remove the code from Pharo-Core and just load it in Pharo.

Nov. 13, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3205 in pharo: monticello's error on Linux

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #1 on issue 3205 by elendilo: monticello's error on Linux http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3205 I have taken a look at the pharo.sh script in the one-click image distribution. It helped me to substitute "-encoding utf8" instead of the default "-encoding latin1" and it works.

Nov. 13, 2010

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12237

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

12237 ----- - Issue 3087: optimize hasBindingThatBeginsWith:. Tx Levente, Mariano and Guillermo.

Nov. 13, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3087 in pharo: optimize hasBindingThatBeginsWith:

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: closed Comment #4 on issue 3087 by stephane.ducasse: optimize hasBindingThatBeginsWith: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3087 in 12237

Nov. 13, 2010

[Pharo-project] [update 1.2] #12236

by stephane ducasse

12236 ----- - Issue 3185: BitmapStreamTests have errors. - Issue 3249: SourceReference throw an error when <historical> is answered. - Issue 3226: New finder enh. Thanks Benjamin van Ryseghem. - Issue 3182: UndoManagerTest>>#testGrouping failing. Thanks Andy Kellens. Some more to come :) Stef

Nov. 13, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3187 in pharo: Undeclared in SmartRefStream>>#nextPut:

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #4 on issue 3187 by adrian.lienhard: Undeclared in SmartRefStream>>#nextPut: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3187 no, I don't have tests...

Nov. 13, 2010