November 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] Issue 3285 in pharo: Obsolete ConfigurationOfRFB

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 3285 by gaston.dalloglio: Obsolete ConfigurationOfRFB http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3285 Pharo image: Pharo-core Pharo core version: Pharo1.2a I have installed RFBServer following this guide http://book.pharo-project.org/book/TipsAndTricks/RemoteDevelopment/ But when I connect an external VNC client I get a DNU: SmallInteger(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #'@-' I've fixed this by simply changing the code "-1@-1" to "-1 @ -1" in the method RFBSesion>>initServer:socket:reverse:, and then the server run fine. But when I look at ConfigurationOfRFB I see this definition is obsolete, this load RFB-lr.31, and the last is RFB-lr.33. In this other book http://book.seaside.st/book/advanced/deployment/maintaining/vnc say that this package is not more soported in Pharo. Its true?

Nov. 23, 2010

[Pharo-project] shout in pharo core 1.2

by Tudor Girba

Hi, In the Moose configuration we are trying to make Shout work in PharoCore 1.2, but we still do not manage to do it properly. Does anybody knows what version works? Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."

Nov. 23, 2010

[Pharo-project] Issue 3284 in pharo: Renaming a Monticello package should keep history

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: laurent.laffont Labels: Type-RequestForEnhancement New issue 3284 by laurent.laffont: Renaming a Monticello package should keep history http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3284 Laurent: I want to rename ProfStefBrowser package to ProfStef-Browser. Is it possible to do so and keep the package history ? I cannot find how. Stephane: you cannot keep the history as far as I know.

Nov. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd: [Pharo-users] TestMock: a full featured mock testing framework now available in SqueakSource

by laurent laffont

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > Yes, TDD is highly popular and encouraged in the Smalltalk community. > And mocks are not necessary in most cases. > Hi Luc, why Mocks are less necessary in Smalltalk than in other (Ruby/Python/whatever...) languages ? Do you have some examples / link ? Sometimes I think a mocking library should be in PharoCore so I don't need to write my own mocks..... Cheers, Laurent > > #Luc > > > 2010/11/23 Dennis Schetinin <chaetal(a)gmail.com> > > How is it compared to Mocketry (http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry.html)? >> SMock? >> >> BTW, isn't TDD without mocks a bit incomplete? And is TDD popular among >> smalltalkers actually? >> >> 2010/11/22 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> >> >> This is cool Anindya. I don't need mocks right now, but I will keep it in >>> mind! >>> >>> I cc'ed Pharo-dev mailing list. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Mariano >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Anindya Haldar <anindya_haldar(a)yahoo.com> >>> Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:11 AM >>> Subject: [Pharo-users] TestMock: a full featured mock testing framework >>> now available in SqueakSource >>> To: pharo-users(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> >>> >>> Dear Pharoers, >>> >>> TestMcok is a full featured mock based test framework that I am very glad >>> to contribute to the community. It is in squeaksource under the project name >>> TestMock. Please feel free to try it, and feedback will be greatly >>> appreciated. The wiki section includes a brief how-to guide with code >>> examples. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Anindya Haldar >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-users mailing list >>> Pharo-users(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dennis Schetinin >> > >

Nov. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] is there an easy way to know the SmallInteger instances?

by csrabak＠bol.com.br

Mariano, Your post has made think. . . for the final user this would put this method farther from OO as possible, wouldn't it?

Nov. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] rename a method programatically

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Cyrille I don't know why you need that but take into account that RB split their packages even more in the last months. So maybe it is easier for you to directly use RB and load with your code, the RB core or the specific package that you need. Mostly if you need some other similar functionalities. Cheers Mariano On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:56 PM, jaayer <jaayer(a)zoho.com> wrote: > > > > > ---- On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:17:05 -0800 Cyrille Delaunay wrote ---- > > >Hello, > > > >I would like to know how I can rename a method programatically and safelly > (without missing to raise any event that has to be raised) > > > > I don't believe there is any simple way to do this. > > Basically, to rename a method you have to remove it first and compile into > its class a new method containing the same source code but with a different > selector at the beginning. This is how the refactory browser does it when > you select "rename" from the "refactor method" menu. If anyone knows of a > better way, I would be interested to hear it. > > >

Nov. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] rename a method programatically

by jaayer

---- On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:17:05 -0800 Cyrille Delaunay wrote ---- >Hello, > >I would like to know how I can rename a method programatically and safelly (without missing to raise any event that has to be raised) > I don't believe there is any simple way to do this. Basically, to rename a method you have to remove it first and compile into its class a new method containing the same source code but with a different selector at the beginning. This is how the refactory browser does it when you select "rename" from the "refactor method" menu. If anyone knows of a better way, I would be interested to hear it.

Nov. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd: [Pharo-users] TestMock: a full featured mock testing framework now available in SqueakSource

by Luc Fabresse

Hi Dennis, Yes, TDD is highly popular and encouraged in the Smalltalk community. And mocks are not necessary in most cases. #Luc 2010/11/23 Dennis Schetinin <chaetal(a)gmail.com> > How is it compared to Mocketry (http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry.html)? > SMock? > > BTW, isn't TDD without mocks a bit incomplete? And is TDD popular among > smalltalkers actually? > > 2010/11/22 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> > > This is cool Anindya. I don't need mocks right now, but I will keep it in >> mind! >> >> I cc'ed Pharo-dev mailing list. >> >> Cheers >> >> Mariano >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Anindya Haldar <anindya_haldar(a)yahoo.com> >> Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:11 AM >> Subject: [Pharo-users] TestMock: a full featured mock testing framework >> now available in SqueakSource >> To: pharo-users(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> >> >> Dear Pharoers, >> >> TestMcok is a full featured mock based test framework that I am very glad >> to contribute to the community. It is in squeaksource under the project name >> TestMock. Please feel free to try it, and feedback will be greatly >> appreciated. The wiki section includes a brief how-to guide with code >> examples. >> >> Regards, >> Anindya Haldar >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-users mailing list >> Pharo-users(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users >> >> >> > > > -- > Dennis Schetinin >

Nov. 23, 2010

[Pharo-project] Issue 3283 in pharo: Symbol dependencie

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Fixed Owner: Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo New issue 3283 by Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo: Symbol dependencie http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3283 Attached : a change sort which fix a dependencie between Symbol and Scanner Attachments: SymbolClassReadFrom.1.cs 532 bytes

Nov. 23, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] rename a method programatically

by Igor Stasenko

This is good question! Behavior and ClassDescription is where you should look at. I don't remember the details, but i could say that its hard to find what is an 'official' way to do that. API is messy. We need to improve the SystemNotification and system changes layer to make everything clear. On 23 November 2010 15:17, Cyrille Delaunay <cy.delaunay(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I would like to know how I can rename a method programatically and safelly > (without missing to raise any event that has to be raised) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Nov. 23, 2010