January 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo dev image rc2 thoughts

by Dale Henrichs

Mariano, The progress-bar problem is solvable. The progress bar problem appears because the dev image doits reinitalize the progress bar class. The first question is: "Must the progress bar code be initialized?" if no, then remove the initialization code and the problem should be solved:) If yes, then I will dig into the problem and see what I can come up with ... there are a couple of routes I can take, but I'd like to know that we can't bypass the initialization before getting my hands that dirty:) Dale ----- "Mariano Martinez Peck" <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: | 2010/1/24 Miguel Enrique CobÃ¡ Martinez <miguel.coba(a)gmail.com> | | > | > Now to the point. I understand that the separation of concerns is | good, | > because ImageForDevelopers is already a separated and tested | package | > that shouldn't be inside ConfigurationOfPharo. | > | | I will tell you a bit the background: First, when I took the | installScript | from Damien, there where some stuff done in the script (like settings | the | preferences and the fonts) done in the installScript. It didn't have | sense | for me (of course I asked Damien) and I put that in ImageForDevelopers | (and | this is cool because it is versiones with monticello). Actually in | DEVImageCreator >> install. I need also to clean that class as it has | a lot | of old stuff. But not time for the moment. | | When I create rc1, ImageForDevelopers was a dependency of | ConfigurationOfPharo as you said. There was a problem installing it | with the | progress bar and Metacello. The image just frezze because of a | sempahore and | a delay....see issue: | http://code.google.com/p/metacello/issues/detail?id=39 | But I can even reproduce the problem....So, that quick solution (as I | needed | to relase the Pharo image) was to put in the installScript. | | And after a while I discovered that I even like more that approach. | Someone | may want just the packages of a dev image, but not to set | preferences, | fonts, cleanups, etc. And I don't have the Metacello bug. | The problem I found also putting it as a dependency is that it has to | be the | LATEST (I think that you cannot even said that XX package has to be | the last | one to be loaded) package to be loaded. I can put it as postDoIt for | the | project, but this cannot be done because it is ONLY required for | certain | groups | | | > - Shouldn't be necessary to create a | ConfigurationOfImageForDevelopers | > and in this configuration reference ConfigurationOfPharo and then | the | > installScript for the dev image use *only* | > ConfigurationOfImageForDevelopers? | > | > | It can work, but actually for me we are having a problem (maybe we | need the | support the post/pre doit for groupos...but dale said it was | complicated). I | would like to just do (ConfigurationOfPharo project version: 'XXX') | load:'ImageForDeveloper' |

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] RBSpelling errors when class has Pool Dictionary - Re: [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10507-rc2dev10.01.2

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I haven't such file :( > > True, you are on a mac too :-) > > Since two months, yes :) > Go to "Apple Mail" and type the word "Refactoring". It should be > highlighted with the spell-checker. Click on "Add to Dictionary". Then > the tests should pass. > > No, sorry. I have to fix the tests. Wait. > > hahahahha no problem. I am not hurry at all :) > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] #10507

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> > wrote: > > > > On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > > > > > > Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home > because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1" > > > > > yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some > downloads per day. > > > > > > Please, do it only for the core. For the dev image I want to wait a > couple of days to see everything is more or less ok. Although I think the > image is pretty stable (which was my most important and even unique > objective) as the reported "issues" were not important and really only one > issue which is present since a lot of time.. > > > But what is the use of having people download the image before? The image > linked was > > My idea was to build a Dev image only for BetaTesters. Those people who can help us to test and don't care if the image blows up in their face. Because it was easier, I upload that image in gforge and send the email to the list. However, my idea was to do the real ANN (to the rest of the people) and link in download section (so that final users can download it) once the image was already tested and without big problems. What do you think ? > > http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25156/pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.… > > 356 downloads. > > Now it is > > http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25397/Pharo1.0-10508-rc2dev10.01.2.… > > with just 51 downloads. > > The core image is not linked from the downloads page. > > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] #10507

by Marcus Denker

On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > > > Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1" > > > yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day. > > > Please, do it only for the core. For the dev image I want to wait a couple of days to see everything is more or less ok. Although I think the image is pretty stable (which was my most important and even unique objective) as the reported "issues" were not important and really only one issue which is present since a lot of time.. But what is the use of having people download the image before? The image linked was http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25156/pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1.… 356 downloads. Now it is http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25397/Pharo1.0-10508-rc2dev10.01.2.… with just 51 downloads. The core image is not linked from the downloads page. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] TestIndenting fails with Exupery (was: [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10507-rc2dev10.01.2)

by laurent laffont

2010/1/24 Henrik Sperre Johansen <henrik.s.johansen(a)veloxit.no> > On 24.01.2010 21:36, laurent laffont wrote: > > It's the opposite for me :) > > TestIndenting>>testCR2 and TestIndenting>>testNewLineLeaveSpacesOnOldLine > fails because FTPlugin is here (in exupery). If I delete FTPlugin directory, > these tests succeed. > > Laurent > > Technically, the tests don't fail because the Plugin no longer exists (ie, > these tests failing does not indicate there's anything wrong with the > plugin), but because a font which satisfies the hardcoded assumptions about > width is used when no FreeType-fonts are availiable. ;) > You're right. The test results depends on the font that is choosed as default font. May be the tests should change the Form object font ? Laurent

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] #10507

by Marcus Denker

On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >> >> Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1" >> > yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day. > > I will do that. Done: http://www.pharo-project.org/home http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] #10507

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > > > Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because > it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1" > > > yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some > downloads per day. > > Please, do it only for the core. For the dev image I want to wait a couple of days to see everything is more or less ok. Although I think the image is pretty stable (which was my most important and even unique objective) as the reported "issues" were not important and really only one issue which is present since a lot of time.. Cheers Mariano > I will do that. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] #10507

by Marcus Denker

On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1" > yes, and we need to link it on the download page... there are quite some downloads per day. I will do that. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [update] #10507

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> wrote: > 10507 > ----- > > Issue 945: Annoying bug: UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: > #mimeTypes > Issue 1769: TestRunner author while running tests > Issue 1772: testSymbolTableM6812 is failing > Issue 1815: Monticello prints class definitions to the transcript while > loading > Issue 1841: Make the System -> Software update a preference for 1.0 > Issue 1861: Use old network (note: to take effect you need to restart > the image) > Issue 1771: testFinalizationOfEquals sometimes fails and sometimes > doesn't > > With this update, all pending 1.0 issues have been resolved and tests are > green. > > If no new issues pop up soon, we are going to declare this version as RC2. > Adrian: shouldn't we update http://www.pharo-project.org/home because it says "Current status: 1.0 RC1" > > Cheers, > Adrian > ___________________ > http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 24, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] TestIndenting fails with Exupery (was: [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10507-rc2dev10.01.2)

by Henrik Sperre Johansen

On 24.01.2010 21:36, laurent laffont wrote: > It's the opposite for me :) > > TestIndenting>>testCR2 and > TestIndenting>>testNewLineLeaveSpacesOnOldLine fails because FTPlugin > is here (in exupery). If I delete FTPlugin directory, these tests succeed. > > Laurent Technically, the tests don't fail because the Plugin no longer exists (ie, these tests failing does not indicate there's anything wrong with the plugin), but because a font which satisfies the hardcoded assumptions about width is used when no FreeType-fonts are availiable. ;) Cheers, Henry

Jan. 24, 2010