January 2010 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Problems with Strike fonts

by Henrik Sperre Johansen

On 08.01.2010 16:24, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Thanks Henrik. However, I tried what you told me and still is ugly :( > > Any idea? > > Thanks > > Mariano > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1780 It fixes italic fonts of too narrow width, as well as bold italic versions being synthetically derived from italic/bold Fonts when a non-synthetic bold italic Font exists. Cheers, Henry

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] System -> About in Dev images

by Mariano Martinez Peck

2010/1/11 Miguel Enrique CobÃ¡ Martinez <miguel.coba(a)gmail.com> > El lun, 11-01-2010 a las 22:06 +0000, Michael Roberts escribiÃ³: > > I'm afraid i've got rather lost in this thread. > > > > >> As an after thought after seeing other posts on the issue, I think > > >> more than a generic warning that "may break the image" the > > >> Monticello comments and/or a simple explanation on the reasons and > > >> affected packages *before* the update starts with an option to > > >> proceed or abort is much in need. > > >> > > >> > > >> Yes, maybe. Then thing is that I am not sure in which cases it > > >> would break. Only in overrides? How many overrides do we have from > > >> external pacakges in Core stuff? I have no idea. > > > > > > > I think given that we are at a very early stage of building the Pharo > > image from PharoCore i.e Metacello just coming on etc, we should > > simplify the concerns above. > > > > Basically we should only build Pharo on top of a known PharoCore. Just > > because packages don't contain overrides does not imply that moving > > the core image will break packages on top. Don't offer such a feature, > > and then worry about what will happen. > > > > Part of the Pharo build script should set a flag that prevents system > > update in the short term. Longer term we should switch the available > > update mechanism to #loadLatest on the ConfigurationOfPharo. There is > > then one System update feature, but different implementation in Pharo > > vs PharoCore. > > > > So the vote is for disabled for now? > > Yes. And this is cool because we have to put focus in to make Pharo images more stable. We cannot introduce such a feature when we are not even stable with Dev images. Let's go step by step. Once we get stable Dev images, good processes and package managment, then we can review this stuff about updating. Do you want to do it ? ;) > > cheers, > > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- > Miguel CobÃ¡ > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 11, 2010

[Pharo-project] Spell check test cases

by Stan Shepherd

Hi Lukas, I created some test cases for internal spell check, at http://www.squeaksource.com/RBBugFixes Some are failing, as there are $' characters being passed through from the parser. Also, the literals check sees to be checking the node, rather than the node value. There are some suggested changes in the same repository, that make the tests run green, and don't appear to affect the rest of Refactoring-Tests. please let me know if these make sense. Thanks, ...Stan -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Spell-check-test-cases-tp4288633p4288633.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] System -> About in Dev images

by Mariano Martinez Peck

> > PS.: Before Stef puts a line asking for code, I believe we already > have the machinary for this available, if this is not the case, then > we'll need to put code in! > > he has a google bot that answers that. It checks for certain words like "wish" "would like" and if true, send the email :) > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > This is an extension to SmallLint. Like Slime. It is run when you run > > code critics. > > > > Alternatively you can execute it like this: > > > > ORLintBrowser > > openRule: (RBCompositeLintRule rules: (RBCompositeLintRule > > rulesGroupedFor: RBSpellingRule) name: 'Spelling') > > environment: (BrowserEnvironment new forPackageNames: #('Kernel' > > 'Collections-Abstract')) > > > > Maybe I should add a menu to the already long refactoring commands? > Yes, maybe this will be easier to use than having to run the lints. > > With Helvetia you get it live in the text editor as a wavy red line. > > Along with the other lint rules as a wavy yellow line. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Stan Shepherd <stan.shepherd414(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Stan Shepherd > > <stan.shepherd414(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Stan, can you check if there is another package missing from the > >> > previous > >> > dev image ? > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > Mariano > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Hi Mariano, attached > > > > > > did you know about the Gmail feature (it is in Lab) that detects certain > > key > > words like "attached" or "attach" and when you are going to send an > email, > > a > > popup brigns saying "Are you sure you don't have to attach something? " > > > > ;) > > > > > >> is the list of differences from 10502 to 10505. All > >> missing packages seem to relate to O2, except for Spelling. > >> > >> Is this what you meant? > >> > >> > > But, yes, exactly that. Don't care that there is a changelog.txt for > each > > dev images comparing exactly this, but I had a problem for the moment > with > > that. > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > >> Cheers, ...Stan > >> > >> http://n2.nabble.com/file/n4288408/packagesDiff10502to10505.ods > >> packagesDiff10502to10505.ods > > > > > > Hi, I only browse the forum through Nabble, and it's attaching fine. > http://n2.nabble.com/file/n4288408/packagesDiff10502to10505.ods > > see: > > http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-td4278312… > > sorry if it's not coming through on email. > > Previous file is > http://n2.nabble.com/file/n4285691/loadprocess.txt > > Do those links work? > Sorry, I don't know why, I didn't receive the attach in the email. But a anyway, the links work perfect (I always forget to attach file) I have no idea what your problem is. Now I am confused: you have two things: you sent me the difference from the packages and also the stacktrace from messagetally. This piece of thread is from changes, but your links are for the MessageTally. Anyway, this thread is already too big. I would send a separate and clear mail to the mailing list to see if someone can help you. Thanks about the packages info and the testing. Cheers Mariano ...Stan > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-tp4278312… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] Refactoring Browser depenences

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> It reactors your spell errors away :-P > > > > mmmmmmm I never seen that working in my code and it seems to be > installed > > in almost all PharoDev images... > > > > Do I need to do something to enable it ? > > It is an extension to SmallLint. You need to run lint to see it point > out your errors. To see the wavy lines live in your code you need > Helvetia (probably I could also patch Shout). > Ahhh ok, that's explain why I didn't see it :) You know, it is funny becuase sometimes I miss to have a spell checker in code with undeline, but then, when I have it, it bothers me hahhahaha > > > Does it depends on something ? I ask because Stef said that maybe it > > depends in a library or something like that. > > No, it depends on nothing other than the refactoring engine. > > Ok, perfect. > > I saw there is a SpellingPlugin. Is that compiled in all VMs? do you > know ? > > Only on OS X. But as I said, there is an alternative stupid > spellchecking engine written in Smalltalk include. > > Cool thanks lukas! > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] System -> About in Dev images

by Miguel Enrique CobÃ¡ Martinez

El lun, 11-01-2010 a las 22:06 +0000, Michael Roberts escribiÃ³: > I'm afraid i've got rather lost in this thread. > > >> As an after thought after seeing other posts on the issue, I think > >> more than a generic warning that "may break the image" the > >> Monticello comments and/or a simple explanation on the reasons and > >> affected packages *before* the update starts with an option to > >> proceed or abort is much in need. > >> > >> > >> Yes, maybe. Then thing is that I am not sure in which cases it > >> would break. Only in overrides? How many overrides do we have from > >> external pacakges in Core stuff? I have no idea. > > > > I think given that we are at a very early stage of building the Pharo > image from PharoCore i.e Metacello just coming on etc, we should > simplify the concerns above. > > Basically we should only build Pharo on top of a known PharoCore. Just > because packages don't contain overrides does not imply that moving > the core image will break packages on top. Don't offer such a feature, > and then worry about what will happen. > > Part of the Pharo build script should set a flag that prevents system > update in the short term. Longer term we should switch the available > update mechanism to #loadLatest on the ConfigurationOfPharo. There is > then one System update feature, but different implementation in Pharo > vs PharoCore. > So the vote is for disabled for now? > cheers, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Miguel CobÃ¡ http://miguel.leugim.com.mx

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1

by Lukas Renggli

> This is an extension to SmallLint. Like Slime. It is run when you run > code critics. > > Alternatively you can execute it like this: > > ORLintBrowser > Â Â Â Â openRule: (RBCompositeLintRule rules: (RBCompositeLintRule > rulesGroupedFor: RBSpellingRule) name: 'Spelling') > Â Â Â Â environment: (BrowserEnvironment new forPackageNames: #('Kernel' > 'Collections-Abstract')) > > Maybe I should add a menu to the already long refactoring commands? With Helvetia you get it live in the text editor as a wavy red line. Along with the other lint rules as a wavy yellow line. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

Jan. 11, 2010

Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1

by Stan Shepherd

Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Stan Shepherd > <stan.shepherd414(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> > >> > Hi Stan, can you check if there is another package missing from the >> > previous >> > dev image ? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > Mariano >> > >> > >> >> Hi Mariano, attached > > > did you know about the Gmail feature (it is in Lab) that detects certain > key > words like "attached" or "attach" and when you are going to send an email, > a > popup brigns saying "Are you sure you don't have to attach something? " > > ;) > > >> is the list of differences from 10502 to 10505. All >> missing packages seem to relate to O2, except for Spelling. >> >> Is this what you meant? >> >> > But, yes, exactly that. Don't care that there is a changelog.txt for each > dev images comparing exactly this, but I had a problem for the moment with > that. > > Thanks a lot. > > > >> Cheers, ...Stan >> >> http://n2.nabble.com/file/n4288408/packagesDiff10502to10505.ods >> packagesDiff10502to10505.ods > > Hi, I only browse the forum through Nabble, and it's attaching fine. http://n2.nabble.com/file/n4288408/packagesDiff10502to10505.ods see: http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-td4278312… sorry if it's not coming through on email. Previous file is http://n2.nabble.com/file/n4285691/loadprocess.txt Do those links work? ...Stan -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-tp4278312… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 11, 2010