September 2009 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [ANN] 10430

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

- Issue 1135: FreeType fonts render incorrectly after repeated image save without quitting Thanks andy!!! - Issue 1062: Deprecation of String>>asCharacter leads to strange behavior - Polymorph Widgets Thanks gary!!!! Stef

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Package Browser (bis)

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Integrated in 10430 Stef On Sep 2, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > Polymorph-Widgets-gvc.86 now has the frame adornments themed. > Hope you like the new look. > > Regards, Gary > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ramiro Diaz Trepat > To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 9:48 PM > Subject: [Pharo-project] Package Browser (bis) > > I am very happy now that the package browser is back with us, but I > have a couple of questions: > > 1. Where did the refactoring tools go? This version does not seem > to include them. > > 2. I know this may be too picky, but I don't know if you realized > that when you start editing, instead of seeing a whole red frame (as > unsaved) we only have left 4 red pixels, one in each corner of the > editing pane. is this worthy of a ticket? > > Cheers > > r. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project________… > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Added package SLICE-RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn-PeterHugossonMiller.3 to PharoInbox

by Henrik Johansen

Loads fine for me, and tests remain unchanged. Also seems like a reasonable change. Will you do WriteStream on: and friends next? ;) Cheers, Henry On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:21 35PM, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote: > Hi there, > > This is my first contribution to PharO :-) > > I've followed the instructions on the "How to Contribute" page, and > there is now a bunch of packages, and a SLICE-package that depends > on all of them (named in the subject of this message) in the PharO > inbox. One of the packages (KernelTests-PeterHugossonMiller.142.mcz) > I have managed to miss the log message, but otherwise I believe I > have done everything correctly. I attach screenshots of the > TestRunner results run before and after my changes. > > Please could someone review the changes and let me know how I did. > > -- > Cheers, > Peter > > Before my changes: > > <Before_RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn.png> > > After my changes: > <After_RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn.png> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Added package SLICE-RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn-PeterHugossonMiller.3 to PharoInbox

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Damien can you have a look? Thanks Peter :) Excellent! Stef On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote: > Hi there, > > This is my first contribution to PharO :-) > > I've followed the instructions on the "How to Contribute" page, and > there is now a bunch of packages, and a SLICE-package that depends > on all of them (named in the subject of this message) in the PharO > inbox. One of the packages (KernelTests-PeterHugossonMiller.142.mcz) > I have managed to miss the log message, but otherwise I believe I > have done everything correctly. I attach screenshots of the > TestRunner results run before and after my changes. > > Please could someone review the changes and let me know how I did. > > -- > Cheers, > Peter > > Before my changes: > > <Before_RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn.png> > > After my changes: > <After_RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn.png> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 2, 2009

[Pharo-project] Added package SLICE-RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn-PeterHugossonMiller.3 to PharoInbox

by Peter Hugosson-Miller

Hi there, This is my first contribution to PharO :-) I've followed the instructions on the "How to Contribute" page, and there is now a bunch of packages, and a SLICE-package that depends on all of them (named in the subject of this message) in the PharO inbox. One of the packages (KernelTests-PeterHugossonMiller.142.mcz) I have managed to miss the log message, but otherwise I believe I have done everything correctly. I attach screenshots of the TestRunner results run before and after my changes. Please could someone review the changes and let me know how I did. -- Cheers, Peter *Before my changes:* [image: Before_RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn.png] *After my changes:* [image: After_RemoveReferencesToReadStreamOn.png]

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] How much stable the seaside with pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Lukas is developing all the seaside 2.9 in pharo since may 2008. Stef On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Laszlo Zsolt Kiss wrote: > Dear Developers! > > I have a questions for you. > How much stable the Seeaside with the Pharo? > How many people use it in the production and business envinronment? > Thanks. > > Laszlo Zsolt Kiss > > ps.: Sorry for my bad english:) > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Higher priority processes using ThreadSafeTranscript throw Error: Error: Instances of UndefinedObject are not indexable (was Re: Issue 1053: )

by John McIntosh

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Stan Shepherd <stan.shepherd414(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Test case attached, although I can't get it to catch the error. Use with > ***caution***. In the one click image it often freezes the image. I note for these cases where catching the error with an debug dialog seems impossible, goodness knows we saw lots of that in Sophie via Tweak, then try something like Smalltalk logError:'Fatal error' inContext: thisContext to: 'SqueakDebug.log'.]] This then logs the context to a log file, for later review. For evil UI related bugs this can be of assistance. -- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci(a)smalltalkconsulting.com> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com ===========================================================================

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Higher priority processes using ThreadSafeTranscript throw Error: Error: Instances of UndefinedObject are not indexable (was Re: Issue 1053: )

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Thanks may be I should not have tried to make the Transcript threadsafe. And may be one of these days it would be great to get a cleaner model for morphic threading. stef > Hi, if you fork processes at a higher priority, they still throw the > error in > issue 1053. In core 10428 I more often get Instances of > UndefinedObject are > not indexable. It is trying to send size to a MultiNewParagraph > while it is > still nil. By the time the debugger opens, the object is there. > > Test case attached, although I can't get it to catch the error. Use > with > ***caution***. In the one click image it often freezes the image. > > http://n2.nabble.com/file/n3565757/NSThreadsafeTranscriptPriorityTest.st > NSThreadsafeTranscriptPriorityTest.st > > It seems like this may be the case Dale identified- "I assume that > with a > sufficiently complex test case, involving heavy background window > updates > while using some of the operations that call #displayWorldSafely a > problem > would be revealed, but there's no guarantee that a mutex would be the > solution". > > Cheers, ...Stan > > > Dale Henrichs wrote: >> >> Ready for review: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1053 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Issue-1053-Transcript-updates-from-foreground-process-… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] How much stable the seaside with pharo

by Alexandre Bergel

Thanks for sharing your feelings... Alexandre On 2 Sep 2009, at 09:59, David Mitchell wrote: > Been running Seaside on Pharo since October 2008. > > More stable than Squeak. > > Stability has been great. Low volume on an intranet, however. > > No memory leaks or crashes in production. > > I have seen memory leaks from my development image (particularly if I > work with test data). I now only save my development image after > loading from Monticello. > > So, if I'm working with my database and test data and I see a change I > want to make, I write the tests and code. Do some test runs and check > the code into Monticello. But, I don't save my image at that point. > Next time I restart, I reload from Monticello. I do this even though > I'm working by myself. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Laszlo Zsolt Kiss<lzskiss(a)dublin.ie> > wrote: >> Dear Developers! >> >> I have a questions for you. >> How much stable the Seeaside with the Pharo? >> How many people use it in the production and business envinronment? >> Thanks. >> >> Laszlo Zsolt Kiss >> >> ps.: Sorry for my bad english:) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

Sept. 2, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] How much stable the seaside with pharo

by David Mitchell

Been running Seaside on Pharo since October 2008. More stable than Squeak. Stability has been great. Low volume on an intranet, however. No memory leaks or crashes in production. I have seen memory leaks from my development image (particularly if I work with test data). I now only save my development image after loading from Monticello. So, if I'm working with my database and test data and I see a change I want to make, I write the tests and code. Do some test runs and check the code into Monticello. But, I don't save my image at that point. Next time I restart, I reload from Monticello. I do this even though I'm working by myself. On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Laszlo Zsolt Kiss<lzskiss(a)dublin.ie> wrote: > Dear Developers! > > I have a questions for you. > How much stable the Seeaside with the Pharo? > How many people use it in the production and business envinronment? > Thanks. > > Laszlo Zsolt Kiss > > ps.: Sorry for my bad english:) > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Sept. 2, 2009