August 2009 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Package Browser

by Adrian Lienhard

On Aug 26, 2009, at 04:43 , Chris Cunningham wrote: > 2009/8/25 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>: >> Now I wonder....what about sending this message in >> ScriptLoader>>cleanUpForRelease or >> ScriptLoader>>cleanUpForProduction >> >> ? > > I'd suggest doing a condenseSources instead, at the time of the > official Pharo 1.0 release. This would have the benefit of completely > clearing out the changes file and allowing the renaming of the sources > file to something like PharoV1.sources instead of the current > SqueakV39.sources, which I find a bit odd, but understandable. yes, that's what we plan to do. Adrian

Aug. 26, 2009

[Pharo-project] new socket API

by Philippe Marschall

Uhm, guys I really appreciate that I can use IPv6 but: Yesterday I spent some time trying to open a socket given that I know the IP address and the port. The lack of documentation or suggested types sure wasn't helpful and I wished Pharo was statically typed so that I at least knew what I had to pass in. That's what I came up with: hostIP := (SocketAddressInformation forHost: anIpString service: '' flags: 0 addressFamily: SocketAddressInformation addressFamilyINET4 socketType: SocketAddressInformation socketTypeStream protocol: SocketAddressInformation protocolTCP) first socketAddress. socket := Socket new. socket connectTo: hostIP port: portNumber. There's gotta be a better way to do this. The whole API with arrays where you have to know the index, ByteArray objects, integer flags and so forth seems like a blast from the past. Cheers Philippe

Aug. 26, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Package Browser

by Chris Cunningham

2009/8/25 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>: > Now I wonder....what about sending this message in > ScriptLoader>>cleanUpForReleaseÂ orÂ ScriptLoader>>cleanUpForProduction > > ? I'd suggest doing a condenseSources instead, at the time of the official Pharo 1.0 release. This would have the benefit of completely clearing out the changes file and allowing the renaming of the sources file to something like PharoV1.sources instead of the current SqueakV39.sources, which I find a bit odd, but understandable.

Aug. 26, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Package Browser

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Smalltalk condenseChanges > > This will free up some space in the changes file - at the cost of > removing version history in your image. > Excellent!! Thanks for the help. I added it here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CodeSnippets Now I wonder....what about sending this message in ScriptLoader>>cleanUpForRelease or ScriptLoader>>cleanUpForProduction ? > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Aug. 26, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Package Browser

by Chris Cunningham

Smalltalk condenseChanges This will free up some space in the changes file - at the cost of removing version history in your image.

Aug. 25, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Package Browser

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2009/8/25 Ramiro Diaz Trepat <ramiro(a)diaztrepat.name> > >> Hi guys, >> >> I would really like to use the package browser again. >> I thought it was again loadable in the latest images with: >> >> ScriptLoader loadOBAlpha. >> >> But this is failing, during the installation; it does not find some >> dependencies (OBTextMorphEditorWithShout) and leaves the browser in an >> inconsistent state. > > > I could reproduce your problem. > > I also tried ScriptLoader loadOB but I get the error: "' > You have reached the size limit of the changes file. > You must take action now to reduce it. > Close this error. Do not attempt to proceed.'" > Mmm...seems to happen this to anything I do. I did a "system -> software update" and got the same error. Is there a way to shrink the changes so that to create some free space? thanks mariano > > I know this is a known bug but how can I load OB then ? > > cheers, > > Mariano > > >> >> Is there another repository to load it from? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> r. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > >

Aug. 25, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Package Browser

by Mariano Martinez Peck

2009/8/25 Ramiro Diaz Trepat <ramiro(a)diaztrepat.name> > Hi guys, > > I would really like to use the package browser again. > I thought it was again loadable in the latest images with: > > ScriptLoader loadOBAlpha. > > But this is failing, during the installation; it does not find some > dependencies (OBTextMorphEditorWithShout) and leaves the browser in an > inconsistent state. I could reproduce your problem. I also tried ScriptLoader loadOB but I get the error: "' You have reached the size limit of the changes file. You must take action now to reduce it. Close this error. Do not attempt to proceed.'" I know this is a known bug but how can I load OB then ? cheers, Mariano > > Is there another repository to load it from? > > Thanks > > > r. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Aug. 25, 2009

[Pharo-project] Package Browser

by Ramiro Diaz Trepat

Hi guys, I would really like to use the package browser again. I thought it was again loadable in the latest images with: ScriptLoader loadOBAlpha. But this is failing, during the installation; it does not find some dependencies (OBTextMorphEditorWithShout) and leaves the browser in an inconsistent state. Is there another repository to load it from? Thanks r.

Aug. 25, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Win32 registry manipulation?

by Schwab,Wilhelm K

Got it - thanks!!!! -----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-bounces(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Miguel CobÃ¡ Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:58 AM To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Win32 registry manipulation? Search the archives, some days ago someone asked the same question. There was a package for that in the mail response. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K<bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu> wrote: > Hello all, > > Do we have anything that can read and write to the Windows registry? Â I would not much care except that I have some unit tests that do things create ODBC data sources, and it would be nice to keep that functionality assuming it easy to do so. > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Aug. 25, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] 138 registrations at ESUG 2009 conf !

by Mariano Martinez Peck

is the list of people published somewhere? thanks! Mariano On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Noury Bouraqadi <bouraqadi(a)ensm-douai.fr>wrote: > > > Dr. Noury Bouraqadi > ESUG Treasurer > http://vst.ensm-douai.fr/noury/ > -------------- > -ESUG 17th International Smalltalk Conference - Brest, France, August 31 - > September 4, 2009 > http://www.esug.org/Conferences/2009 > > > > > >

Aug. 25, 2009