June 2009 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] idea to have a better methodFinder :)

by Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras

where can i find Pragma? do you have a link? because i couldnt find it. thanks On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Brian Brown <brian(a)ablelinktech.com> wrote: > > > > a quicksilver for Squeak > > Exactly right. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 17, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] idea to have a better methodFinder :)

by Brian Brown

> a quicksilver for Squeak Exactly right.

June 17, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] MIT ScaledDecimal (Issue 816) has not been integrated correctly

by Nicolas Cellier

(SystemNavigation default allMethodsSelect: [:meth | | hasABadLiteral | hasABadLiteral := false. meth literalsDo: [:lit | (lit class = ScaledDecimal and: [lit numerator isNil or: [lit denominator isNil]]) ifTrue: [hasABadLiteral := true]]. hasABadLiteral]) do: [:m | m actualClass recompile: m methodSymbol from: m actualClass] 2009/6/17 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > Ok nicolas > Sorry for the problem. > > I guess that I will wait for the code snippet > > stef writing should be writing a boring report for a month ago :) > > On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > > > in update10307 (script385) related to > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=816 : > > > > ScaledDecimal2-Part1-nice.1.cs had a postscript to mutate old > > instances to new instances and not losse existing ScaledDecimals (at > > least the literals in ScaledDecimalTests). > > > > This has not been applied, so some ScaledDecimal now have a nil > > numerator and denominator. > > This makes some tests fail. > > > > Cure: detect and recompile these methods having a broken > > ScaledDecimal literal. > > I don't have time to give a code snippet by now... > > > > Nicolas > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 17, 2009

[Pharo-project] wikiserver 1.4 beta testers needed

by John M McIntosh

After a week of fun & learning at WWDC 09, I find I need just a few more beta testers for WikiServer 1.4 This is an incremental change that will support import/export of the wiki data to/from the iPhone and to/from a desktop machine, along with adding a bit of security to turn public editing on/off. Being careful I don't want to push the changes live to the app store until I feel there is little change of the update trashing a user's existing wiki data. So if you would like to test please email me, not the list with your iPhone/iPod touch UDID so I can add you to the beta test list. -- = = = ======================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci(a)smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com = = = ========================================================================

June 17, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Problems loading Squeak Map

by Dale Henrichs

Frank, If I'm not mistaken the Package Universe will load the latest version of a dependent package ... which can be problematic, if your code doesn't work with the latest version:) I don't believe that issues with FFI are related to the version of the Smalltalk code. It is more likely that FFI problems are related to the vm that you are using and which platform you are on. FFI requires vm mods to work (either a plugin or explicit code) and those mods are invariably os-specific. Early versions of the closure vm may not have supported FFI on all (or any platforms). I seem to recall running into problems in the early days of the closure vm, but at that time there were other issues as well and I haven't revisited FFI since then. If you get past the FFI hurdle, I anticipate that GemTools may run into issues related to the version of OmniBrowser being used in the latest Pharo. GemTools can be sensitive to OmniBrowser changes because there is a specific version of OmniBrowser running in GemStone that communicates with the OmniBrowser running in Pharo. We created the one click GemTools images in an attempt to avoid dealing with the problems of version skew. In the longer term we anticipate that we'll be able to make it possible to roll your own GemTools image, but until then, the one-click is your best bet. Hope this helps, Dale ----- "Frank Church" <vfclists(a)googlemail.com> wrote: | It is my mistake, it is simply FFI 3.9.1 listed in the GemTools | dependencies. | | Yhen you install a package automatically, how do you find out which | version was installed? | | 2009/6/16 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>: | > | > | > 2009/6/16 Frank Church <vfclists(a)googlemail.com> | >> | >> If I want to understand the FFI Browser 3.9.1 by hand, how would I | go | >> about it? I just used the ScriptLoader instFFI and the FFI was | installed. | >> | >> How can I check that the right item was installed? Is there a way | to check | >> that the version installed is the same as the one listed in the | Universe | >> Browser, ie that it is the same package as FFI Browser 3.9.1 | >> | >> The Resources/package-cache directory now holds FFI-Kernel-ar.9.mcz | so I | >> guess it must be the right one. | > | > | > What is FFI Browser? Do you mean just FFI ? FFI is foreign function | > interface an it is used to call C code from Squeak. | > | > I don't know what do you mean for "FFI Browser" | > | > | > Mariano | > | > | >> | >> | >> 2009/6/16 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com> | >>> | >>> What Pharo version are you using? Perhaps something related to | this: | >>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=510 | >>> | >>> What about installing latest FFI from MC instead of Universe? To | do this, | >>> just evaluate ScriptLoader loadFFI | >>> | >>> Universe 3.9.1 uses FFI-Kernel-ar.8.mcz and the latest is | >>> FFI-Kernel-ar.9.mcz | >>> | >>> Anyway I know nothing about GemTools so perhaps I am saying | nonsense | >>> things. | >>> | >>> Best, | >>> | >>> Mariano | >>> | >>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Frank Church | <vfclists(a)googlemail.com> | >>> wrote: | >>>> | >>>> When I get round to installing the GemTools, the first item it | starts | >>>> downloading is FFI browser 3.9.1 and it halts with the Error - | >>>> MessageNotUnderstood MimeType->IndexOf, | >>>> | >>>> Prior to that is a call to HttpUrl normalizeContents and a few | others. | >>>> | >>>> | >>>> 2009/6/16 Frank Church <vfclists(a)googlemail.com>: | >>>> > Worked first time!! | >>>> > | >>>> > Pretty cool!! | >>>> > | >>>> > 2009/6/16 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>: | >>>> >> You can do this: | >>>> >> | >>>> >> |instClass| | >>>> >> instClass := Smalltalk at: #Installer ifAbsent: [ScriptLoader | >>>> >> loadLatestPackage: 'Installer-Core' fromSqueaksource: | 'Installer'. | >>>> >> Smalltalk | >>>> >> at: #Installer]. | >>>> >> instClass ss | >>>> >> Â Â Â Â project: 'XMLSupport'; | >>>> >> Â Â Â Â install: 'XML-Parser'. | >>>> >> | >>>> >> .... | >>>> >> | >>>> >> .... | >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >>>> >> Cheers, | >>>> >> | >>>> >> Mariano | >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >>>> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Frank Church | >>>> >> <vfclists(a)googlemail.com> | >>>> >> wrote: | >>>> >>> | >>>> >>> When I type the command and 'do-it' I get the error : | 'Unknown | >>>> >>> variable Install, please correct or cancel' | >>>> >>> | >>>> >>> Is it already built into Pharo or does it require an | additional | >>>> >>> package to be installed? | >>>> >>> | >>>> >>> 2009/6/16 Brian Brown <brian(a)ablelinktech.com>: | >>>> >>> > In the workspace. | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> > - Brian | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> > On Jun 16, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Frank Church wrote: | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> >> Is the Installer command something to run in the Workspace | or in | >>>> >>> >> some | >>>> >>> >> other window? | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ | >>>> >>> > Pharo-project mailing list | >>>> >>> > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | >>>> >>> > | >>>> >>> | >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ | >>>> >>> Pharo-project mailing list | >>>> >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | >>>> >>> | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >>>> >> _______________________________________________ | >>>> >> Pharo-project mailing list | >>>> >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | >>>> >> | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | >>>> >> | >>>> > | >>>> | >>>> _______________________________________________ | >>>> Pharo-project mailing list | >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | >>>> | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | >>> | >>> | >>> _______________________________________________ | >>> Pharo-project mailing list | >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | >>> | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | >> | >> | >> _______________________________________________ | >> Pharo-project mailing list | >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | >> | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | > | > | > _______________________________________________ | > Pharo-project mailing list | > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | > | | _______________________________________________ | Pharo-project mailing list | Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 17, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fix] Issue890 Mantis6535 SortedCollection loose sortBlock

by Lukas Renggli

>> Helps a little... but it feels to me that displaying a method, the >> slowest >> part is the Annotationpane. Maybe we can turn that off? It's off in >> the core >> image, too. > > I have tried disabling it but haven't felt any difference. Please check out the Seaside One-Click image. It is pretty fast, especially when using the standard Squeak look. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

June 17, 2009

[Pharo-project] [ANN] Core image #10342

by Marcus Denker

https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/22466/Pharo0.1Core-10342.zip -- Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile

June 17, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fix] Issue890 Mantis6535 SortedCollection loose sortBlock

by Damien Cassou

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Marcus Denker<denker(a)acm.org> wrote: > Helps a little... but it feels to me that displaying a method, the > slowest > part is the Annotationpane. Maybe we can turn that off? It's off in > the core > image, too. I have tried disabling it but haven't felt any difference. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

June 17, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fix] Issue890 Mantis6535 SortedCollection loose sortBlock

by Marcus Denker

On 17.06.2009, at 09:34, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Marcus Denker<denker(a)acm.org> wrote: >> I wonder if OB would not be much faster if the auto-category feature >> would >> be turned off? > > are you talking about the dynamic protocols (long methods, > override...)? They are much faster than before. You can disable them > to see if they are a source of slowdowns by going to the preference > browser, 'dynamic protocols' category. > Helps a little... but it feels to me that displaying a method, the slowest part is the Annotationpane. Maybe we can turn that off? It's off in the core image, too. Marcus

June 17, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] MIT ScaledDecimal (Issue 816) has not been integrated correctly

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Ok nicolas Sorry for the problem. I guess that I will wait for the code snippet stef writing should be writing a boring report for a month ago :) On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > in update10307 (script385) related to > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=816 : > > ScaledDecimal2-Part1-nice.1.cs had a postscript to mutate old > instances to new instances and not losse existing ScaledDecimals (at > least the literals in ScaledDecimalTests). > > This has not been applied, so some ScaledDecimal now have a nil > numerator and denominator. > This makes some tests fail. > > Cure: detect and recompile these methods having a broken > ScaledDecimal literal. > I don't have time to give a code snippet by now... > > Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 17, 2009