April 2009 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] New Pharo-dev based on 10279

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

But I could not reproduce it with other packages. May be this is a seaside problem? Stef On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:00 PM, John Toohey <johnptoohey(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> - Download the image from the Pharo site >> - Download the closure enabled OSX VM from Pharo site. >> - Start MC, and tried to load the Seaside29-A3 build with MC script >> generated by seaside builder. >> >> Is there something else I should try? > > Please report on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list with > this details. > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Recent changes to Pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi scott could you enter a bug tracking entry for each of these items that we should fix? Thanks for reporting that. Stef On Apr 18, 2009, at 4:15 AM, Scott Gibson wrote: > I have noticed with the newer releases (pharo0.1-10277dev09.04.2 and > pharo0.1-10279dev09.04.3) there, which seemed to me, to be fixes/ > improvements that were lost from the earlier (Pharo0.1Core-10268cl and > pharo0.1-10268dev09.04.1) releases. These following occur for both > the Mac and Windows platforms: > > #1) Running "(1 to: 100) do: [:each | Transcript show: each; cr]" is > near instantaneous in the Transcript window compared to the more > recent releases. > > #2) For the process "the UI process" in the Process Browser - when > "the UI process" is selected processes actually show up but not in the > more recent releases. > > #3) The debugger buttons are once again centered and squished in the > middle of the debugging window. Is this actually now the norm? > > I am not sure exactly what is expected for these in Pharo's current > state but it seemed that perhaps some fixes had reverted and I should > submit issues for them. Was version 10268 the anomaly or are these > actual issues? > > > Thanks! > Scott > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Another Morphic Casualty?

by Adrian Lienhard

This is: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=747 It seems to appear only in a certain situation as I describe in the report. Adrian On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:28 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > It is already in the bug archive list. > Now what would be useful is to see where this cool method was. > > Stef > > On Apr 18, 2009, at 1:42 AM, Rob Rothwell wrote: > >> Can anyone confirm this behaviour and I'll log it? >> >> 1. Load 10279 image. >> 2. world->tools->File Browser >> 3. Collapse the drive folder! >> >> = MessageNotUnderstood: UndefinedObject>>pathParts. >> >> If you trace it back, it looks like it is Morphic-Related... >> >> Rob >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

April 18, 2009

[Pharo-project] [ANN] closureAsText and literalsDo:

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

:) Thanks hernan and nicolas Next the new event system and we should be able to really focus on going beta. Stef

April 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] About literalsDo: deprecation

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi Nicolas Issue 748: literals do -> literalsDo: fixed in 10280 (I wanted back these miliseconds :)). Stef On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:53 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > I notice while scanning Eliot changes that #literalsDo: is a > deprecated message... > But (literals do:) replacement is not neutral concerning speed. > It creates an Array where literalsDo: did not. > This is not a detail because this is called on each and every method > when scanning code: > > For example, I tried this in Pharo image: > > Time millisecondsToRun: [SystemNavigation default allGlobalRefs] > ->5356 with Eliot's literalsDo: > ->8947 pharo version calling literals do: > > This change spoils a few minutes out of our every day work ;) > > Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] New Pharo-dev based on 10279

by Damien Cassou

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:00 PM, John Toohey <johnptoohey(a)gmail.com> wrote: > - Download the image from the Pharo site > - Download the closure enabled OSX VM from Pharo site. > - Start MC, and tried to load the Seaside29-A3 build with MC script > generated by seaside builder. > > Is there something else I should try? Please report on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list with this details. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

April 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Another Morphic Casualty?

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

It is already in the bug archive list. Now what would be useful is to see where this cool method was. Stef On Apr 18, 2009, at 1:42 AM, Rob Rothwell wrote: > Can anyone confirm this behaviour and I'll log it? > > 1. Load 10279 image. > 2. world->tools->File Browser > 3. Collapse the drive folder! > > = MessageNotUnderstood: UndefinedObject>>pathParts. > > If you trace it back, it looks like it is Morphic-Related... > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

April 18, 2009

Re: [Pharo-project] Recent changes to Pharo

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

These are actual issues Thanks for spotting them. Probably these changes got reverted when the changes of eliot got merged back. argh! Stef On Apr 18, 2009, at 4:15 AM, Scott Gibson wrote: > I have noticed with the newer releases (pharo0.1-10277dev09.04.2 and > pharo0.1-10279dev09.04.3) there, which seemed to me, to be fixes/ > improvements that were lost from the earlier (Pharo0.1Core-10268cl and > pharo0.1-10268dev09.04.1) releases. These following occur for both > the Mac and Windows platforms: > > #1) Running "(1 to: 100) do: [:each | Transcript show: each; cr]" is > near instantaneous in the Transcript window compared to the more > recent releases. > > #2) For the process "the UI process" in the Process Browser - when > "the UI process" is selected processes actually show up but not in the > more recent releases. > > #3) The debugger buttons are once again centered and squished in the > middle of the debugging window. Is this actually now the norm? > > I am not sure exactly what is expected for these in Pharo's current > state but it seemed that perhaps some fixes had reverted and I should > submit issues for them. Was version 10268 the anomaly or are these > actual issues? > > > Thanks! > Scott > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

April 18, 2009

[Pharo-project] Recent changes to Pharo

by Scott Gibson

I have noticed with the newer releases (pharo0.1-10277dev09.04.2 and pharo0.1-10279dev09.04.3) there, which seemed to me, to be fixes/ improvements that were lost from the earlier (Pharo0.1Core-10268cl and pharo0.1-10268dev09.04.1) releases. These following occur for both the Mac and Windows platforms: #1) Running "(1 to: 100) do: [:each | Transcript show: each; cr]" is near instantaneous in the Transcript window compared to the more recent releases. #2) For the process "the UI process" in the Process Browser - when "the UI process" is selected processes actually show up but not in the more recent releases. #3) The debugger buttons are once again centered and squished in the middle of the debugging window. Is this actually now the norm? I am not sure exactly what is expected for these in Pharo's current state but it seemed that perhaps some fixes had reverted and I should submit issues for them. Was version 10268 the anomaly or are these actual issues? Thanks! Scott

April 18, 2009

[Pharo-project] Another Morphic Casualty?

by Rob Rothwell

Can anyone confirm this behaviour and I'll log it? 1. Load 10279 image. 2. world->tools->File Browser 3. Collapse the drive folder! = MessageNotUnderstood: UndefinedObject>>pathParts. If you trace it back, it looks like it is Morphic-Related... Rob

April 17, 2009