July 2008 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 29 fix in PharoInbox

by Serge Stinckwich

2008/7/2 Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: > On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 23:34 +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote: >> I put the fix (with the tests) of issue 29 in PharoInbox : >> Collections-zz.85.mcz and CollectionsTests-zz.41.mcz >> > Can you put the names of the packages in the ticket and > change the status to "Fixed"? This should be done when the package is include by StÃ©phane in Pharo. How could i change the status of a ticket ? -- Serge Stinckwich Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/

July 2, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 29 fix in PharoInbox

by Norbert Hartl

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 23:34 +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote: > I put the fix (with the tests) of issue 29 in PharoInbox : > Collections-zz.85.mcz and CollectionsTests-zz.41.mcz > Can you put the names of the packages in the ticket and change the status to "Fixed"? And it is a good idea if we all could agree to use our realnames as Author initials for the packages. Norbert

July 2, 2008

[Pharo-project] Issue 29 fix in PharoInbox

by Serge Stinckwich

I put the fix (with the tests) of issue 29 in PharoInbox : Collections-zz.85.mcz and CollectionsTests-zz.41.mcz -- Serge Stinckwich Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/

July 2, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 26 / squeak 7073

by Norbert Hartl

And after updating the slice you need to do String initialize Norbert On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 23:23 +0200, Norbert Hartl wrote: > I've uploaded a new slice which incorporates the > squeak update changes for version 7073. > > SLICE-squeakUpdate7073-noha.5 > > I can't change the status of the ticket as google is > not allowing me to do any single action today :) > First I got captchas for submitting issues and now > I'm locked out. > > "You have performed the requested action too many times in a 24-hour > time period. Or, you have performed the requested action too many times > since the creation of your account." > > The last sentence makes me a bot afraid :) > > Norbert > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

July 2, 2008

[Pharo-project] issue 26 / squeak 7073

by Norbert Hartl

I've uploaded a new slice which incorporates the squeak update changes for version 7073. SLICE-squeakUpdate7073-noha.5 I can't change the status of the ticket as google is not allowing me to do any single action today :) First I got captchas for submitting issues and now I'm locked out. "You have performed the requested action too many times in a 24-hour time period. Or, you have performed the requested action too many times since the creation of your account." The last sentence makes me a bot afraid :) Norbert

July 2, 2008

[Pharo-project] UI plans Question

by michael_atkisson＠comcast.net

Are there any plans to make it possible to be able to move windows out of the main ui environment window.

July 2, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] 3.9.1, version numbers and fixes

by Adrian Lienhard

On Jul 2, 2008, at 17:59 , Norbert Hartl wrote: > I'm a little bit confused. I started to have a look > at the squeak fixes of 3dot10 we like to integrate. > Looking at the version number I marked all version > number up to 7075 as being duplicate (in the issue > trackr) as we started from 3.9.1 which is 7075. But > now I think I misunderstand something. the numbers nnnn do not seem to be unique among 3.9 and 3.10. The reason likely is because 3.9.1 was done after 3.10 started, it continued numbering from 3.9 creating duplicates. You can see this in the update stream: http://ftp.squeak.org/updates/updates.list Therefore, the number alone does not uniquely identify the change. > I tried to merge squeak version 7076 into pharo. > I did some stuff manually to be able to merge the > monticello packages of that release. But the changes > are massive. It's collections, collectionstests and > kernel. There are even changes for widestring which > I don't found in previous updates. I think its easiest to load the changesets from Mantis into Pharo and then save a slice with the modified packages to the inbox. This will take quite some work, especially because we also need to check whether the fix makes sense and which changeset is the correct one if there are multiple ones etc. Can other people help with this? I suggest to change the status to "Started" when you start working on an issue to avoid conflicts. Adrian

July 2, 2008

[Pharo-project] 3.9.1, version numbers and fixes

by Norbert Hartl

I'm a little bit confused. I started to have a look at the squeak fixes of 3dot10 we like to integrate. Looking at the version number I marked all version number up to 7075 as being duplicate (in the issue trackr) as we started from 3.9.1 which is 7075. But now I think I misunderstand something. I tried to merge squeak version 7076 into pharo. I did some stuff manually to be able to merge the monticello packages of that release. But the changes are massive. It's collections, collectionstests and kernel. There are even changes for widestring which I don't found in previous updates. Can somebody explain where we started off and what needs to be included. Pharo seems to be completely out of sync with 3.10. Norbert

July 2, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] 7072 and universes

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

leave out. but this is important that we have a set of certified packages. Stef On Jul 2, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > Squeak update 7072 updates the universes package. Do we want universes > in the image or should I leave it out? > > Norbert > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

July 2, 2008

[Pharo-project] 7072 and universes

by Norbert Hartl

Squeak update 7072 updates the universes package. Do we want universes in the image or should I leave it out? Norbert

July 2, 2008