June 2008 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Broken tests

by Norbert Hartl

On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:17 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > > And please take into account my posting "Removing ScriptLoader > > legacy" on squeak-dev. > > > I could not find it. > Can you point it to me? > > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-June/129234.html In the meantie I uploaded a fix for ReleaseTest>>testUndeclared. It is called SLICE-ReleaseTestFixUndeclared. Seldomly a lot of the issues were missing class variables. Even in newer code from you. In ScriptLoader you have inboxRepository as instance var but in method inboxRepository you use InboxRepository. As the same is used from the class side I assumed you wanted to use a class var. Norbert > > Especially things in ScriptLoader are subject to > > Undeclared which lets the ReleaseTest fail. I had a talk on irc and it > > seems that for 3.10 that were removed (from Undeclared) manually (I > > have > > no other idea). I'll have look if ScriptLoader is the only suspect. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 13, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo logos

by Norbert Hartl

On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:50 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi guys > > here are some proposals > I like the blue one. But there have something. > Please comment > The circle of the light should be clipped by the darker area below. Otherwise the perpective flips and it appears odd. Norbert

June 13, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Need code review

by Norbert Hartl

Stef wrote down subject lines from postings to this list http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2008-June/000238.html http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2008-June/000323.html Norbert On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:37 +0200, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Sorry to weak up so lately, but where the source code is accessible ? > I spent few minutes on looking at: > - PharoInBox > - list of taks on gforge > - list of issues on google > > and I haven't found where the code to review could be... > Any hint? > > Alexandre > > > On 13 Jun 2008, at 11:18, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > > > Hi guys > > > > I would like some other people to have a look at > > > > [Pharo-project] Hunting down nebraska > > [Pharo-project] MVC removal step2 investigations > > > > Can somebody have a look? > > > > Stef > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > >

June 13, 2008

[Pharo-project] Pharo logos

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys here are some proposals I like the blue one. But there have something. Please comment Stef

June 13, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Need code review

by Alexandre Bergel

Sorry to weak up so lately, but where the source code is accessible ? I spent few minutes on looking at: - PharoInBox - list of taks on gforge - list of issues on google and I haven't found where the code to review could be... Any hint? Alexandre On 13 Jun 2008, at 11:18, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi guys > > I would like some other people to have a look at > > [Pharo-project] Hunting down nebraska > [Pharo-project] MVC removal step2 investigations > > Can somebody have a look? > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

June 13, 2008

[Pharo-project] Need code review

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi guys I would like some other people to have a look at [Pharo-project] Hunting down nebraska [Pharo-project] MVC removal step2 investigations Can somebody have a look? Stef

June 13, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Broken tests

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > And please take into account my posting "Removing ScriptLoader > legacy" on squeak-dev. I could not find it. Can you point it to me? > Especially things in ScriptLoader are subject to > Undeclared which lets the ReleaseTest fail. I had a talk on irc and it > seems that for 3.10 that were removed (from Undeclared) manually (I > have > no other idea). I'll have look if ScriptLoader is the only suspect. >

June 13, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Broken tests

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > And please take into account my posting "Removing ScriptLoader > legacy" on squeak-dev. Ok I missed it. > Especially things in ScriptLoader are subject to > Undeclared which lets the ReleaseTest fail. Yes We should clean that. > I had a talk on irc and it > seems that for 3.10 that were removed (from Undeclared) manually (I > have > no other idea). I'll have look if ScriptLoader is the only suspect. > > Norbert > > > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 08:23 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> Excellent we are getting there. >> Today I will harvest them and the changes of damien. >> We should take into account the feedback of andreas on Nan. >> >> Stef >> >> On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> >>> I've fixed the following 7 tests (see inbox: SLICE-test-fixes.al. >>> 1.mcz): >>> >>> testRootsOfTheWorld -- test removed >>> testLocalMethodWithSameCodeInTrait -- removed duplicated method >>> ClassDescription>>fileOutCategory: >>> testFinalizationOfEquals -- test fixed >>> testHash -- remove all assertions/tests that have hardcoded hash >>> values >>> DateAndTimeEpochTest>>#testHash >>> DateAndTimeLeapTest>>#testHash >>> TimeTest>>#testHash >>> TimespanTest>>#testHash >>> >>> Now 8 tests are still failing. We are getting there... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Adrian >>> >>> On Jun 11, 2008, at 19:07 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> excellent! >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> On Jun 11, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just for phun, I ran all the tests in the Pharo image. There are >>>>> only 13 failures, 2 expected failures, and no errors! >>>>> >>>>> I have started a page to give an overview: >>>>> >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BrokenTests >>>>> >>>>> Please update this page with an appropriate comment if you are >>>>> working on any of these (or if you fix them). >>>>> >>>>> - on >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 13, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Broken tests

by Norbert Hartl

And please take into account my posting "Removing ScriptLoader legacy" on squeak-dev. Especially things in ScriptLoader are subject to Undeclared which lets the ReleaseTest fail. I had a talk on irc and it seems that for 3.10 that were removed (from Undeclared) manually (I have no other idea). I'll have look if ScriptLoader is the only suspect. Norbert On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 08:23 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Excellent we are getting there. > Today I will harvest them and the changes of damien. > We should take into account the feedback of andreas on Nan. > > Stef > > On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > > > I've fixed the following 7 tests (see inbox: SLICE-test-fixes.al. > > 1.mcz): > > > > testRootsOfTheWorld -- test removed > > testLocalMethodWithSameCodeInTrait -- removed duplicated method > > ClassDescription>>fileOutCategory: > > testFinalizationOfEquals -- test fixed > > testHash -- remove all assertions/tests that have hardcoded hash > > values > > DateAndTimeEpochTest>>#testHash > > DateAndTimeLeapTest>>#testHash > > TimeTest>>#testHash > > TimespanTest>>#testHash > > > > Now 8 tests are still failing. We are getting there... > > > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > On Jun 11, 2008, at 19:07 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > > > >> excellent! > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> On Jun 11, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Just for phun, I ran all the tests in the Pharo image. There are > >>> only 13 failures, 2 expected failures, and no errors! > >>> > >>> I have started a page to give an overview: > >>> > >>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BrokenTests > >>> > >>> Please update this page with an appropriate comment if you are > >>> working on any of these (or if you fix them). > >>> > >>> - on > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Pharo-project mailing list > >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 13, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Broken tests

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Excellent we are getting there. Today I will harvest them and the changes of damien. We should take into account the feedback of andreas on Nan. Stef On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > I've fixed the following 7 tests (see inbox: SLICE-test-fixes.al. > 1.mcz): > > testRootsOfTheWorld -- test removed > testLocalMethodWithSameCodeInTrait -- removed duplicated method > ClassDescription>>fileOutCategory: > testFinalizationOfEquals -- test fixed > testHash -- remove all assertions/tests that have hardcoded hash > values > DateAndTimeEpochTest>>#testHash > DateAndTimeLeapTest>>#testHash > TimeTest>>#testHash > TimespanTest>>#testHash > > Now 8 tests are still failing. We are getting there... > > Cheers, > Adrian > > On Jun 11, 2008, at 19:07 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> excellent! >> >> Stef >> >> On Jun 11, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >> >>> >>> Just for phun, I ran all the tests in the Pharo image. There are >>> only 13 failures, 2 expected failures, and no errors! >>> >>> I have started a page to give an overview: >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BrokenTests >>> >>> Please update this page with an appropriate comment if you are >>> working on any of these (or if you fix them). >>> >>> - on >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 13, 2008