June 2008 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization?]

by Adrian Lienhard

Ah, my bad. I committed the improved script to the inbox. If you can still change it, take al.448, else it should not be a problem. ScriptLoader.al.448 just has a slightly better migration script. Adrian On Jun 19, 2008, at 13:53 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > adrian > > > should I used al.448 which is in the inbox? > > Stef > > > On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > >> - changed WeakRegistry to use WeakIdentityKeyDictionary (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6347 >> ) >> - FinalizerTest reverted to real test case >> - added missing class variables to DigitalSigntureAlgorithm >> - Fix issue #13: TraitsTests pollutes ProtoObject subclasses >> (Mantis 7090) >> - make BitmapStreamTest clean up the file bitmapStreamTest.ref.extSeg > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization?]

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

sorry my mistake I did a typo. stef On Jun 19, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 13:51 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> Hi Adrian >> >> I pushed the updates. >> Can you check if this is ok? >> > For me it is not working. It doesn't load any package from > script132. I can't see what is going wrong but I checked > for a few packages that are in script132 and they didn't > get updated. > > Norbert > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization?]

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Yes this was also my impression. I will check 448 Stef On Jun 19, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 13:51 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >> Hi Adrian >> >> I pushed the updates. >> Can you check if this is ok? >> > For me it is not working. It doesn't load any package from > script132. I can't see what is going wrong but I checked > for a few packages that are in script132 and they didn't > get updated. > > Norbert > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization?]

by Norbert Hartl

On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 13:51 +0200, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > Hi Adrian > > I pushed the updates. > Can you check if this is ok? > For me it is not working. It doesn't load any package from script132. I can't see what is going wrong but I checked for a few packages that are in script132 and they didn't get updated. Norbert

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization?]

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

adrian should I used al.448 which is in the inbox? Stef On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > - changed WeakRegistry to use WeakIdentityKeyDictionary (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6347 > ) > - FinalizerTest reverted to real test case > - added missing class variables to DigitalSigntureAlgorithm > - Fix issue #13: TraitsTests pollutes ProtoObject subclasses (Mantis > 7090) > - make BitmapStreamTest clean up the file bitmapStreamTest.ref.extSeg

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization?]

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Hi Adrian I pushed the updates. Can you check if this is ok? Stef On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > - changed WeakRegistry to use WeakIdentityKeyDictionary (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6347 > ) > - FinalizerTest reverted to real test case > - added missing class variables to DigitalSigntureAlgorithm > - Fix issue #13: TraitsTests pollutes ProtoObject subclasses (Mantis > 7090) > - make BitmapStreamTest clean up the file bitmapStreamTest.ref.extSeg

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd:

by Oscar Nierstrasz

What about this one? http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x275/rairadium/12_Barad_Dur_Paul_Lasaine… ;-) On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:25, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > I would stop for now and keep this one for example > > <Picture 1.pdf> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd:

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

I would stop for now and keep this one for example

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] [Fwd: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization?]

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

excellent I will push the cs in the stream Stef On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > Hi Stef, > > I harvested most of the remaining changes in the inbox, including > Norberts fix (see other mail in this thread). > > - changed WeakRegistry to use WeakIdentityKeyDictionary (http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6347 > ) > - FinalizerTest reverted to real test case > - added missing class variables to DigitalSigntureAlgorithm > - Fix issue #13: TraitsTests pollutes ProtoObject subclasses (Mantis > 7090) > - make BitmapStreamTest clean up the file bitmapStreamTest.ref.extSeg > > I pushed everything into the Pharo repository, updated ScriptLoader > (update10042), and moved the relevant packages from PharoInbox to > PharoTreatedInbox. > > Cheer, > Adrian > > On Jun 18, 2008, at 22:47 , StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi norbert >> >> did you read the answer of nicolas on squeak-dev on your question. >> I read the mantis entry he mentioned >> but i read superficially. :) >> >> Stef >> >> On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 21:37 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >>>> Hi Norbert, >>>> >>>> We do this kind of scripts in the ScriptLoader. Just let me know >>>> when >>>> you published your slice and I will prepare the ScriptLoader update >>>> script which Stef can then push into the update stream. >>>> >>> I published the slice 1 minute before sending the mail :) >>> >>> Have fun, >>> >>> Norbert >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 19:30 , Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, >>>>> >>>>> now I'm all for fixing it and ressurect the test case. >>>>> I'll upload something to PharoInbox. Afterwards it needs >>>>> to be reinitialized. What is the preferred way of having >>>>> doits in the update stream? >>>>> >>>>> Anyway I uploaded SLICE-WeakRegistryAndFinalizerTestFix >>>>> to PharoInbox. >>>>> >>>>> afterwards a >>>>> >>>>> WeakRegistry default initialize: WeakRegistry default size >>>>> >>>>> will be necessary. >>>>> >>>>> Norbert >>>>> >>>>> From: Andreas Raab <andreas.raab(a)gmx.de> >>>>> Date: June 18, 2008 7:02:11 PM GMT+02:00 >>>>> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org >>>>>> >>>>> Subject: [squeak-dev] Re: Bug in object finalization? >>>>> Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 09:22 -0700, Andreas Raab wrote: >>>>>>> Norbert Hartl wrote: >>>>>>>> There was a test in 3.9 testing this (it failed). In 3.10 >>>>>>>> the test got removed but I think it is a bug. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>> The test itself is buggy (see http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6347) >>>>>>> but once you fix the test it illustrates a problem in >>>>>>> WeakRegistry which needs to use a WeakIdentityKeyDictionary >>>>>>> instead of a WeakKeyDictionary. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, what I said. Do you see an harmful side effects by exchanging >>>>>> the dictionary? >>>>> >>>>> No - we've fixed this a long time ago in our code base. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> - Andreas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- >>>>> project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

June 19, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Fwd:

by Samuel MORELLO

Hi all and thanks for your comments. As i said to stephane i have tried your different remarks (top of the lighthouse, size of the text, .. ) but i am not convaince about the tests i have made. For the last version, when i tried to put a "n" at the top of the lighthouse, it was not clear. So i have put the "eye" a little bit higher to have a little more distinction when the logo is small. For me, I like the eye on top the lighthouse it can have significations if we want... (pharo community take care of his developers, for example, ...;- ) May be we can put in standby this logo for now and test it in different situations to have a better idea of it. and then modify it again ? (wiki, keynote template, ...) It is not that i do not want to modify the logo but i stagnate a little bit for now. Saying that, you can continue to send your remarks on it . May be we will find something that solve our problem. Regarding the gloss effect i will create a declinaison of this one. What do you think ? Thanks, Samuel Le 18 juin 08 Ã 23:31, Lukas Renggli a Ã©crit : >>> Peux tu me dire si cette version va mieux ? >>> Jai essayÃ© avec un n mais ca ne va pas des masses. >>> J'ai ecartÃ© l'espace entre 'l'oeil' et le base du phare. En petit >>> ca passe mieux. > > I like the colors, but it looks a bit flat in my opinion. What about > some gloss on the letters and the a flare of the light? > > Also I don't know if the "distorted" letters underline the strength > (stable, clean) of Pharo? > > Cheers, > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

June 19, 2008