November 2008 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] OT: how much Smalltalk code is in Linux kernel

by Michael Roberts

-9 lines? did I read that right? Mike

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Giovanni Corriga

Adrian Lienhard ha scritto: > On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:55 , Serge Stinckwich wrote: >> Why not Pharo-stable and Pharo-unstable ? > > because there exists a stable CORE too. Changes are done on the core and > from this the IDE is then built. > > I hope this helps to explain the rationale behind the suggested naming. > A non-Smalltalker who reads Pharo-IDE will assume this is the IDE only, and not the CORE+the dev tools. Why not something like Pharo-SDK? Giovanni

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Tudor Girba

Nov. 3, 2008

[Pharo-project] OT: how much Smalltalk code is in Linux kernel

by Pavel Krivanek

http://www.ohloh.net/projects/linux/analyses/latest

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Adrian Lienhard

ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo. Adrian On Nov 3, 2008, at 17:07 , Ramon Leon wrote: >> Marcus Denker wrote: >> >>> I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo. >> >> +0.9 >> >> Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1) >> >> Michael > > Ditto, I like Core and Dev better, but Pharo-Core and Pharo aren't bad > either. > > Ramon Leon > http://onsmalltalk.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Nov. 3, 2008

RE: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Ramon Leon

> Marcus Denker wrote: > > > I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo. > > +0.9 > > Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1) > > Michael Ditto, I like Core and Dev better, but Pharo-Core and Pharo aren't bad either. Ramon Leon http://onsmalltalk.com

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Re: Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Bill Schwab

Francois, Welcome to the list! +1 on the naming scheme. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab(a)anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com 11/03/08 9:56 AM >>> > During ESUG, we discussed about that with Marcus. IIRC, he wanted the > current pharo-dev (your Pharo-IDE) to be named just Pharo. The core, > which should only be used by people "knowing what they do" would be > named Pharo-core. I agree, in my humble opinion it seems to be the best choice. Francois ps: I'm new to the list. Keep the good work with pharo guys! _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Damien Cassou

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Marcus Denker <denker(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: > I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo. So do I -- Damien Cassou Peter von der AhÃ©: Â«I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luckÂ». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

Nov. 3, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Michael Rueger

Marcus Denker wrote: > I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo. +0.9 Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1) Michael

Nov. 3, 2008

[Pharo-project] Re: Pharo 1.0 release plan

by Francois Stephany

> During ESUG, we discussed about that with Marcus. IIRC, he wanted the > current pharo-dev (your Pharo-IDE) to be named just Pharo. The core, > which should only be used by people "knowing what they do" would be > named Pharo-core. I agree, in my humble opinion it seems to be the best choice. Francois ps: I'm new to the list. Keep the good work with pharo guys!

Nov. 3, 2008