November 2008 - Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] MNU addMakeSiblingHandle:

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

ok I will add that in the next release. This is strange since normally I did it in the update script. Stef On Nov 12, 2008, at 11:57 PM, nicolas cellier wrote: > > The halo button brings me a debugger : > Message not understood addMakeSiblingHandle: > > If that happens to you, just doIt: > Preferences resetHaloSpecifications. > > Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Nov. 13, 2008

[Pharo-project] Rio renamed to File/Directory

by Keith Hodges

lets see how it goes Keith

Nov. 13, 2008

[Pharo-project] MNU addMakeSiblingHandle:

by nicolas cellier

The halo button brings me a debugger : Message not understood addMakeSiblingHandle: If that happens to you, just doIt: Preferences resetHaloSpecifications. Nicolas

Nov. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] About senders

by Lukas Renggli

> I would be happy to see a highlighting fixed, because sometimes it > highlights wrong portion of text instead of actual send. > Also, if look senders of #self. - in OB its not highligths text at all :( I fixed the highlighting a long time ago for OB-Refactory. Though, it is only used when triggering the search from the RB tools. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

Nov. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] About senders

by David RÃ¶thlisberger

> I would be happy to see a highlighting fixed, because sometimes it > highlights wrong portion of text instead of actual send. > Also, if look senders of #self. - in OB its not highligths text at all :( yeah, I know, this should really get fixed. David > 2008/11/12 David RÃ¶thlisberger <squeak(a)webcitas.ch>: >>>> May be this was me but I often ask for senders and I get the implemented >>>> method. >>>> May be etoy curiving is driving crazy :) >>> Or your method is recursive :-) >> Probably it's that, because I never get the implementing method when I >> search for senders.

Nov. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] About senders

by Igor Stasenko

Yes, often, when you have a recursive calls , like: foo ^ super foo this method is sender and implementor both. But i don't see much problem with it. I would be happy to see a highlighting fixed, because sometimes it highlights wrong portion of text instead of actual send. Also, if look senders of #self. - in OB its not highligths text at all :( 2008/11/12 David RÃ¶thlisberger <squeak(a)webcitas.ch>: > >>> May be this was me but I often ask for senders and I get the implemented >>> method. >>> May be etoy curiving is driving crazy :) >> >> Or your method is recursive :-) > > Probably it's that, because I never get the implementing method when I > search for senders. > > > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

Nov. 12, 2008

[Pharo-project] [update] #10146

by Marcus Denker

- Issue 219: Cryptography does not load into Pharo -- Marcus Denker -- denker(a)iam.unibe.ch http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker

Nov. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] About senders

by David RÃ¶thlisberger

>> May be this was me but I often ask for senders and I get the implemented >> method. >> May be etoy curiving is driving crazy :) > > Or your method is recursive :-) Probably it's that, because I never get the implementing method when I search for senders. David

Nov. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] About senders

by Damien Cassou

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:54 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > May be this was me but I often ask for senders and I get the implemented > method. > May be etoy curiving is driving crazy :) Or your method is recursive :-) -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

Nov. 12, 2008

Re: [Pharo-project] About senders

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

May be this was me but I often ask for senders and I get the implemented method. May be etoy curiving is driving crazy :) PS: I harvested your changes. On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:36 AM, StÃ©phane Ducasse > <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> this is a call for features. >> Right now senders shows me even the method that defines the method >> I'm >> looking >> for just because it finds the name in the methods. >> >> It would be cool if somebody would enhance the senders to returns >> senders >> and not senders and implementors mixed >> together. > > I don't know what you are talking about: > > - Open a browser on InputSensor>>anyButtonPressed > - Press the 'senders' button and the 'anyButtonPressed' item. > - You won't see the method in the new browser > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >

Nov. 12, 2008