[Pharo-users] About "it's not pharo but smalltalk"
bstjean at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 8 07:47:26 EST 2020
Smalltalk didn't "fail". We just didn't have the CPU power at the time
to achieve our dreams! And "Smalltalk is slow" was tagged forever
besides the name...
2020-02-08 07:17, Ben Coman wrote:The aim of the advertised statement
that Pharo-is-not-Smalltalk is to
> avoid you "later" being surprised if it differs from ST-80.
> A marketing strategy analogous to a "fail early" programming paradigm,
> and avoid such arguments that try to shackle Pharo.
> In practice, its probably many years before Pharo is any more
> incompatible with Smalltalk than the incompatibilities between
> existing Smalltalks.
> But Smalltalk-backward-compatibility should not be one of your
> tick-boxes to choose Pharo.
> cheers -ben
Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean
"A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)
More information about the Pharo-users