[Pharo-users] R: About "it's not pharo but smalltalk"
lorenzo at edor.it
Thu Feb 6 03:48:00 EST 2020
Thanks for mentioning me.
I would just like to point out that I made FuzzyWorld in both Pharo and VSE,
but since all my applications were in VSE (which I have been using since
1985!) I have brought it to VSE for graphic content and tools I had already
As you can see in the first slide of my presentation, FuzzyWorld is an
extension of the Smalltalk classes and not of VSE or Pharo; both can use it.
Anyway, I am a Pharo member, so I have been surprised for comments on my
If I can express my opinion, this discussion is based on nothing: in my
opinion Pharo is Smalltalk; everything else is VAPOR WARE.
Da: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces at lists.pharo.org] Per conto di
Inviato: mercoledì 5 febbraio 2020 19:51
A: pharo-users at lists.pharo.org
Oggetto: Re: [Pharo-users] About "it's not pharo but smalltalk"
Yes, these are two completely different issues...
- Pharo is Smalltalk
- you don't want general Smalltalk discussion polluting this forum
I get it. But as I point out here
, Pharo is in a unique position and I would hope that the Pharo community is
willing to participate in evangelizing Smalltalk.
If there is truly another avenue that is as effective, I'm all ears.
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
>> On 5 Feb 2020, at 18:50, horrido <
> > wrote:
>> It would be like trying to deny that Clojure, Scheme, and Racket are
>> not LISP. Only an imbecile would claim they're not.
> I am pretty sure the mailing lists of Clojure, Scheme or Racket don't
> want you to go there to discuss Common Lisp or Emacs' Lisp or to talk
> about general lisp revivals.
> Especially, they would not want you tell them what they should or
> can't do based on their history.
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
More information about the Pharo-users