[Pharo-users] Code of Conduct

Steve Quezadas steveeq1 at gmail.com
Sun Sep 22 19:40:23 EDT 2019


This isn't science, this is a community. We don't need a CoC, there haven't
been any problems on this list regarding nazis or whatever. This is just a
group of people trying to enforce their political ideologies on everyone
else. Let's just remove the CoC altogether and just replace it with one
line: "this maillist is about Pharo, anything else is offtopic".

If you want to debate on the merits of Islam vs Christianity/ right vs left
/ thugs vs racists , you are free to hold your opinion on some other sub,
but it's offtopic here.

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 4:23 PM Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
offray.luna at mutabit.com> wrote:

> There is no data to support such supposed majority. But even so, free,
> libre, open source communities are not democracies. Imagine the quality of
> code or argumentation based on perceived majorities? If science would be a
> democracy, the earth would be "still" flat.
> On 22/09/19 6:04 p. m., Steve Quezadas wrote:
>
> I would say that the majority don't seem to be in favor of it. This should
> be a democracy.
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 1:53 PM Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
> offray.luna at mutabit.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 22/09/19 3:38 p. m., Steve Quezadas wrote:
>> > > The discussion so far shows that CoC is not a distraction to many
>> >
>> > Actually, the discussion shows that the CoC is "a distraction to many".
>>
>> Actually it shows that some people consider it a distraction, others
>> don't. I think that every body here is able to form its own opinion on
>> that and invest time and effort accordingly.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Offray
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20190922/86067d0f/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-users mailing list