[Pharo-users] Code of Conduct

Steve Quezadas steveeq1 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 21 12:51:06 EDT 2019


My issue is that this covenant is selectively applied to some things, but
not others. The wording might change, but the cultural attitude will
prevail on how it gets "enforced". Again, the best thing to do is simply
keep it neutral and anything not related to pharo get thrown out as
"off-topic".

Harassment has never been a problem with this list. And any talk about the
danger of "nazis" or "thugs" is irrelevent and should be thrown out. I, for
one, don't want to see it on this list.

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:36 AM James Foster <Smalltalk at jgfoster.net> wrote:

> A nice thing about open source and the use of Git is that changes can be
> proposed and adopted quickly. Any proposal should be judged, not on whether
> it is perfect, but whether it makes an improvement. As a corollary, don’t
> assume that the current state is the ideal, but treat it as a platform for
> continuous improvements.
>
> In this case, the phrase you objected to was removed before you made your
> comment.
>
> James
>
> > On Sep 20, 2019, at 11:43 PM, Hilaire <hilaire at drgeo.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Le 19/09/2019 à 21:20, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
> >>
> >> So we are going to take the simplest one we could find that still can
> >> serve our community, you can see it here:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4660
> >>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Given the heat up on the ml, I took a look on the PR. It looks honest
> > and simple for but...
> >
> > ...I am really surprised -- worried will be more accurate ! -- by the
> > second part of this sentence[1]. I think it is even dangerous! What is
> > happening outside of the Pharo community should not be ruled by the
> > 'WE'. The 'WE' is not the universal moral police or justice. If you
> > think a bit about the Richard Stallman event, he was forced to withdraw
> > of the Free Software Foundation because comments he made in a mailing
> > list not related to FSF. He wrote his email contents were misinterpreted
> > (and we know it happens often) and used against him. Whatever it is true
> > or not, I don't see why you should be socially banned (or socially
> > killed) from one place (or more like all place) because of what happen
> > in another place. This kind of important decision can only be taken by
> > the justice where all matter are taken in consideration. Imagine one of
> > you kicked out of Pharo community because you loose your mind in another
> > channel? It makes me feel a bit like the Aldous Huxley world.
> >
> > [1] /We will not tolerate harassment from anyone in the Pharo community,
> > even outside of Pharo’s public communication channels./
> >
> > Hilaire
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Geo
> > http://drgeo.eu
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20190921/51b0d8ad/attachment.html>


More information about the Pharo-users mailing list