[Pharo-dev] Using Gutenberg

Camillo Bruni camillobruni at gmail.com
Wed Oct 30 15:09:11 EDT 2013

>>> I’m not looking for simplicity, I’m looking for a good final product. ePub shouldn’t be simpler, it’s just made for eBooks. 
>>> On the other hand there are editors with WYSIWYG support like:http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-K2Q-tdVbPRI/UI08v7LhzHI/AAAAAAAAABY/vZ5LHjM6nb4/s1600/Screen+Shot+2012-10-28+at+10.07.03+AM.png
>>> And of course there is iBooks Author that I mentioned.
>>> I’m not trying to convince, I’m just trying to understand why development of a new syntax is better the reusing/extending existing one. Or why we can’t use epub + sigil for example.
>> I personally *love* Markdown, it is very easy/productive to write documentation in.
>> But,
>> - there are different, competing and conflicting Markdown variants
>> - there is no official specification (OK, daring fireball, but he refuses to work with github, stack exchange)
>> - there is no formal syntax specification, nowhere
>> - it is very hard to write a parser, it is too loosely specified
>> Pier syntax is not new, it is probably older than Markdown.
>> As far as I am concerned, the most prolific/active authors get to decide, it is a simple as that.
>> I am just hoping that their standalone parser and document model is high quality ;-)
> I have nothing against pier syntax. But imagine person coming from outside, who used markdown to ask questions on stack overflow and write readmes on github, and here he has to use a different syntax for the same purpose. Just a thought about bringing new people into a community :)

I agree with you 100%... plus I use markdown for webdoc => http://files.pharo.org/doc/2.0/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 447 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131030/8a01e948/attachment.asc>

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list