[Pharo-dev] Issue #11876 (Do not allow shouldnt:raise: Error) and Seaside dev. on Pharo 3.0

Philippe Marschall philippe.marschall at netcetera.ch
Thu Oct 24 09:35:06 EDT 2013


On 24.10.13 11:59, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> Am 24.10.2013 um 10:47 schrieb Philippe Marschall
> <philippe.marschall at netcetera.ch
> <mailto:philippe.marschall at netcetera.ch>>:
>
>> On 24.10.13 08:05, Marcus Denker wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23 Oct 2013, at 23:07, Stéphane Ducasse
>>> <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
>>> <mailto:stephane.ducasse at inria.fr>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> just as info: looks like already fixed Pharo issue #11876 makes
>>>>> problem for Seaside in 3.0:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside-dev/2013-October/005509.html
>>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside-dev/2013-October/005540.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It would be a bit sad that Seaside does not work in Pharo3.0
>>>> I imagine that Philippe is tired.
>>>>
>>>> I would revert the change and add a rule that check that the
>>>> argument of shouldnt:raise: should not be an Error
>>>>
>>>
>>> yes, people are not willing to change code all the time…
>>
>> We are willing to change the code where there is a clear benefit. For
>> example it's hard to argue that the new filesystem is an improvement
>> over FileDirectory. We have a partically working Spec based UI for the
>> servers. We would happily change the walkback to a new context API
>> should it fix the bugs in the existing one. However this isn't the
>> case with this change. To sole and only purpose of this change is to
>> break code. This is what annoys me.
>>
> Personally I think the new filesystem is way better than the old one.

Yeah, I meant it's better. I guess I should proof read my mails more.

Cheers
Philippe






More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list