[Pharo-dev] Fogbugz workflow

Camillo Bruni camillobruni at gmail.com
Thu Oct 17 09:17:34 EDT 2013

it is currently working fine, no?
the "status:review" also matches the "Fix Reviewed by the Monkey" status.

On 2013-10-17, at 14:39, btc at openinworld.com wrote:
> Thanks Camillo. So if the Shared Filter > Review displays cases waiting for human review, should it be updated to...
> (status:review or status:reviewed) and area:"1. Pharo Image"
> cheers -ben
> Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> The idea would be that the monkey filters out most of the typical bugs and that then
>> a human (other than the submitter) reviews the code manually and puts it fix-to-include ;)
>> On 2013-10-17, at 10:16, Ben Coman 
>> <btc at openInWorld.com>
>>  wrote:
>>> A further query on workflow with FogBugz.
>>> It seems the Galactic Monkey From Outer Space picks up Cases with status 'Resolved (Fix Review Needed)'. When that is succcessful, what is the next step?  Should I being changing the status to 'Resolved (Fix To Include)' myself or is further human review required?
>>> Referring to 
>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11835
>>> this Case now doesn't appear in any of the Work Needed, Integration nor Review filters.
>>> Hence my query about the next step.
>>> cheers -ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 447 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20131017/602d20d4/attachment.asc>

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list