[Pharo-dev] default monospaced code font
Sven Van Caekenberghe
sven at stfx.eu
Tue Oct 15 10:52:36 EDT 2013
On 15 Oct 2013, at 16:35, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com> wrote:
> except that it is not accurate :)
> - with a monospace you can have bolds and italic without problems (it is a decent one)... and you also can play with sizes (for example, for comments)
> - when you copy&paste you will lose part of your formatting no matter if you have a fixed font or a proportional one (is not true that you lose all of them... in fact I usually do not lose any)
Sorry, but there are no sensible arguments in favour of a monospaced font. It is just not needed (in Smalltalk). Another way to look at it is: 99.99 % of the world use proportional fonts.
BTW, I think whoever made this 'decision' knew it would be _very_ hard to get this passed ;-)
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven at stfx.eu> wrote:
>> Excellent arguments !
>> I am with you 100%
>> On 15 Oct 2013, at 15:21, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Since the days when editors was able to allow me using any fonts, i was always switching to variable-spaced font
>>> for code pane. And i am not speaking about smalltalk or pharo here, it was C and Pascal those days :)
>>> guess, what i would prefer in pharo? :)
>>> The bad things about getting used to monospaced fonts is that you format code and it looks perfect,
>>> but then you print it or copy/paste it somewhere else where it uses other font, and all your beautiful formatting are gone.
>>> Needless to say, that printing press was invented way before first computer or digital printer, and all we know about fonts came
>>> to us from the printing world.. and i think i would be right saying that before first digital printers there was not such thing as monospaced
>>> fonts, because it is not economically efficient: you don't want to waste space on front page of your newspaper by aligning glyphs to some virtual grid.
>>> More than that, it works well only if you using same font size and no bold/underline variants whatever.. as soon as you use variants or different font size,
>>> all the benefits of 'formatting' using monospaced font is gone.
>>> That means, if we employ monospaced font for code, we will be forced to not use bold/italic variants, or different font size (for instance,
>>> i would be like to play with code highlight scheme, where comments using different font size, or where method name uses bigger font size etc).
>>> Best regards,
>>> Igor Stasenko.
More information about the Pharo-dev