camillobruni at gmail.com
Fri Oct 4 08:48:39 EDT 2013
We introduced this class because of the Kernel jobs (see the class comment).
So yes, it is essential for the Pharo Image, not for the Kernel (as you can see by its superclass).
On 2013-10-04, at 14:46, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni at gmail.com> wrote:
> which pharo version?
> On 2013-10-04, at 14:42, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> PharoCommandLineHandler is strange. What is real purpose of this
>> class? Do we need it? It adds UsersManager dependency but I do not
>> think that it really stops the processing of arguments.
>> -- Pavel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 447 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Pharo-dev