[Pharo-dev] why can't we select the browser we want to use anymore via the window menu?
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Sun Nov 24 15:18:43 EST 2013
No you should not. 30 is really usable and we are in alpha.
Now removing the old code browser is a goal but we should not fool ourselves.
Once all the tools are based on Spec, breaking/changing spec will let us without back door.
> This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements.
> Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That may be too much.
> I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that are changing in all corners.
> Philippe Back
> Dramatic Performance Improvements
> Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
> Mail:phil at highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu
> Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos
> High Octane SPRL
> rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium
> Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
> Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - http://spamcast.libsyn.com
> Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
> Hi guys
> It would be good not to clean without a clear vision.
> For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu of a window.
> Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point:
> - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion, Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, …..
> and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage Pharo with configurations.
> - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the part of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon
> on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because
> we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10 packages and 10 classes more in the system.
> I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration inside the image. To me this is totally stupid
> not to do it.
> - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we will remove the old browser
> but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs outside the image to see if you succeed.
> So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pharo-dev