[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: [Smalltalk for small projects only?

Dale Henrichs dhenrich at vmware.com
Sun Jan 29 14:13:46 EST 2012


I have two comments:

  1. "inventing the future" doesn't happen by considering 
     how "ambitious" it may seem. In the end it is probably 
     easier than you think and harder than I think. If it was
     real easy, I'd have been done by now:)

  2. I propose a race:

     You start working on your git backend for Smalltalk and 
     I'll continue working on Metacello, first one to "git work
     flow" wins ... But then the real winners will be the Smalltalk

     I have said this before: "I can hardly wait until someone 
     invents the replacement for Metacello---it will give me 
     more time for other projects:)"


----- Original Message -----
| From: "Steve Wart" <steve at wart.ca>
| The idea of building the git workflow on top of metacello strikes me
| as being somewhat ambitious.

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list