[Pharo-project] [:x :y| x*x. ↑ x + y]
dmason at mason-rose.ca
Sun Jan 29 07:17:14 EST 2012
On 2012-Jan-29, at 4:22 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> is there a naming convention for such blocks. In the chapter I called them escaping block
> but I also used continuation blocks. (I do not like continuation blocks since to me it is unclear) but
> if this is a convention I would follow it.
Continuation blocks is wrong - continuations are a particular thing and this would be confusing.
Escaping blocks is fine, but I call them returning blocks. I could see an argument for either
More information about the Pharo-dev