[Pharo-project] Design change possible with fast SSD's possible?

Guido Stepken gstepken at googlemail.com
Sat Jan 14 08:08:52 EST 2012


Why can't i take a SSD drive as Image? 2 GByte limit automatically falls?
Am 14.01.2012 13:10 schrieb "Milan Mimica" <milan.mimica at gmail.com>:

> On 14 January 2012 12:13, Guido Stepken <gstepken at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> IS there still a "Image" neccessary in Smalltalk then? Or has this former
>> "design approach" nowerdays rather significant disadvantages? (32 Bit,
>> hanging IO during sync, GC....)
>>
>
> As I see it, image is not something that has to reside in physical RAM,
> but it is necessary in Smalltalk.
>
>
> --
> Milan Mimica
> http://sparklet.sf.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20120114/f19f7990/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list