[Pharo-project] Silly Tweet

H. Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Wed Jun 29 18:23:11 EDT 2011

Does this imply that older versions are not maintained (e.g. with
1.2.n or 1.3.n releases) which include important bug fixes.

It seems so and from a practical point of view there is probably no
way around it....


On 6/29/11, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 June 2011 00:12, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:
>> Igor wrote:
>>>On 29 June 2011 15:56, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab at anest.ufl.edu wrote:
>>>> Having an archive seems sufficient - those who need old versions for use
>>>> or research can get them; they don't have to be clogging up the build
>>>> server.  Sounds great.
>>>Indeed. If people would like to use older releases, they should look
>>>for another place, not for build server.
>>>Since build server are there to build & test bleeding-edge (under
>>>development) versions, but not ones which already released and years
>> Ok, so you simply do not want the builds to be used by others.
> Its not about that we don't want users to download older versions
> (they are available for download at pharo official site).
> No. Builds purpose is to follow a development process:  new update -> new
> build.
> Now since we're done with 1.2 (and even almost done with 1.3) there
> will be no new versions for these lines,
> since all development is now in 1.4.
> So, there is no reason to keep jobs for 1.2 and then 1.3 on build
> server, because there will be no activity around it.
>> That's fine.
>> Stephan Eggermont
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list