[Pharo-project] Silly tweet
siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Jun 29 11:59:21 EDT 2011
On 29 June 2011 15:56, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab at anest.ufl.edu> wrote:
> Having an archive seems sufficient - those who need old versions for use or research can get them; they don't have to be clogging up the build server. Sounds great.
Indeed. If people would like to use older releases, they should look
for another place, not for build server.
Since build server are there to build & test bleeding-edge (under
development) versions, but not ones which already released and years
> From: pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker [marcus.denker at inria.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:37 AM
> To: Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Silly tweet
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
>>> Starting to retire 1.2 builds from ci server now that 1.3 is getting ready: http://t.co/fC6w9EQ
>> seem a bit silly. I assume (from Marcus' earlier post) that the retiring takes place sometime after the
>> release of 1.3?
> We did it with 1.1... the problem is that the build server is getting really full if we keep everything.
> And e.g. 1.2 did not change in weeks, so building it (unchanged) and running the tests (unchanged),
> does that make sense?
> We can keep it if people need... but this time we switch servers in addition, so links will change anyway.
>> Providing these builds might lead to people using them, and in commercial
>> development we mostly use released versions to base on. Within much time are we expected to migrate after
>> a new release?
> Nobody removed the release from the archive... just the build server.
> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Pharo-dev