[Pharo-project] Anyone using ImageSegment aut-save on snapshot?
Mariano Martinez Peck
marianopeck at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 08:01:34 EDT 2011
I don't think so:
1) If I remember correctly, that part was broken and I fixed it some time
ago. But nobody ever reported that, I found it.
2) Few people is using ImageSegment in general. In fact, I don't know anyone
apart from Netstyle.net and Squeak Projects (which are not anymore in
3) Not every users of ImageSegment use the default location of the files. I
am almost sure Netstyle.net don't do that.
So, if we join 1), 2) and 3), the conclusion is that I don't know anyone who
is using this feature. But maybe there are....
I would remove them and, in the future, if needed, do a kind of notification
for image renaming where listeners can be registered.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker at inria.fr>wrote:
> There is code in the image that does check on startup for old image
> saveImageSegments: previousFullImageName
> "This method is used for example when you save an image with another
> name. In this case, if there are segments written to files and there are
> ImageSegment instances, then it copies the file from the previous image
> location, to the new one. It is like a backup of the segment files when
> renaming an image. "
> And there is code to clean up these files:
> reclaimObsoleteSegmentFiles "ImageSegment reclaimObsoleteSegmentFiles"
> "Delete segment files that can't be used after this image is saved.
> Note that this is never necessary -- it just saves file space.
> This is usually used when we save and quit an image. It has no sense
> to keep ImageSegment files, if we don't have the ImageSegment object in the
> new image to recover that file. Thus, those objects that are not reclaimed,
> will be removed."
> Is anyone using this?
> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pharo-dev