[Pharo-project] PharoKernel #12217
pavel.krivanek at gmail.com
Thu Oct 28 17:46:53 EDT 2010
a good new, Gofer works fine for me :-)
...and test results for kernel, network, Monticello and Gofer are quite good.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
>> I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties:
>> - better scripts processing
>> - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded packages
>> - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included),
>> however it needs some next fixes to work properly
>> - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive
>> The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split
>> Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately.
> and that they follow the pattern
>> If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple
>> to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore.
> Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration process to it.
> We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not scale) but it requires to have a good alternative.
Well, Configurations were always suspicious to me - they do not even
share a common superclass :-)
More information about the Pharo-dev