[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] private instance variables NOT objects? (Wikipedia)

Bert Freudenberg bert at freudenbergs.de
Mon Oct 25 17:23:59 EDT 2010

On 25.10.2010, at 23:10, Eliot Miranda wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Lawson English <lenglish5 at cox.net> wrote:
> In the Wikipedia entry on Smalltalk, there is this line in the history section, 3rd paragraph, added roughly a year ago:  "...Smalltalk-80 added [[metaclass]]es, to help maintain the "everything is an object" (except private instance variables) paradigm by associating properties and behavior with individual classes, ..."
> Is this one of those esoteric details that mere mortals are not meant to understand, or is this an error?
> "(except private instance variables)" looks like a dig or a jibe.  I would have put it
>  "...Smalltalk-80 added [[metaclass]]es, to help maintain the "everything is an object" paradigm by allowing classes to have their own specific state and behavior, ..."
> Perhaps they were trying to say that because Smalltalk lacks private instance variables Smalltalk objects are not true objects, which is I suppose arguable.  But it makes poor sense to state that private instance variables aren't objects; public inst vars aren't objects either.

It's plain nonsense. Here's the edit that added the "private instance" modifier:


Someone should just correct it.

- Bert -

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20101025/673fe31e/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list