[Pharo-project] modal windows and unit tests
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Thu Oct 14 16:12:12 EDT 2010
yes this means that there is a infrastructural decision to make sure that UI can be controlled.
>>> There are also some basic things that would need some adjustment as I
>>> see it. I think core or basic classes and models shouldn't make any
>>> assumptions about the UI or even if there is an UI at all.
>> YESSSssssssss.... and a minicore will help /force us to do that (imagine an hudson script blocked because of a nice popup)
> Consider that this is not the UI framework that should decide to open
> a dialog or not. If somebody tells morphic to open a window it should
> open it otherwise you break all kinds of assumptions.
> If a user wants to support multiple UI frameworks (or the possibility
> to disable certain UI actions), then he needs to take appropriate
> action himself. OB for example uses notifications for all UI
> interactions that are captured either by a morphic handler (by
> default), a web handler (if you use the web interface), or by a test
> handler (that builds a fake UI that doesn't display anything but gives
> you a nice model to exercise the UI).
> Lukas Renggli
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
More information about the Pharo-dev