[Pharo-project] So...we freeze 1.1 ? (next steps?)

Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at gmail.com
Mon May 17 03:58:26 EDT 2010


On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2010/5/17 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> > <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >> check the network problem.
> >> But we can release rc1 anytime now.
> >>
> >
> > No, please. We are not in a RC yet. We should first go as alpha, then
> beta
> > and finally RC.
> > We cannot go in a RC with the first build ever.
> >
> Yes , we can. Its only a conventions, what you calling alpha , beta or RC.
> But sure thing, more testing and packaging won't hurt.
>
>
But conventions are important. Listen the name: RELEASE CANDIDATE!

Imagine you are going to download a software which is in RELEASE CANDIDATE
and has a lot of problems and bugs....is not good for marketing.
So...they are just conventions, but they are important. We cannot say this
is a release candidate when we haven't even ever created a PharoDev.

For example, did you test it?   We are not speaking about core.



> > Cheers
> >
> > Mariano
> >
> >
> >>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pharo.org/pipermail/pharo-dev_lists.pharo.org/attachments/20100517/89079714/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list