[Pharo-project] Sunit3.2

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Sun Sep 27 05:13:20 EDT 2009


I have the impression that Sunit should be an API specification not a  
implementation common
to all the dialect.

So I would really like to see if nial has some tests for SUnit3.2 and  
which ones pass and fail
on pharo.

Stef

On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Damien Cassou wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> I tried to merge the changes with mcz packages that Niall prepared.  
>> As
>> it says in the commit comment the code is broken. The difference of
>> SUnit in Pharo is so substantial that almost every method was a
>> conflict. I spent a few hours and tried to merge the changes  
>> manually,
>> but in the end it did not work as expected. There are some subtle  
>> bugs
>> in the SUnit code and some tools we have in Squeak are broken
>> afterwards.
>
> What about replacing Pharo's SUnit by Nial's and then re-add lost  
> features?
>
> -- 
> Damien Cassou
> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>
> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
> popular by not having them." James Iry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project





More information about the Pharo-dev mailing list