We have a couple of stale branches, named a bit chaotically, I���d like to rename them in a good way, but I don���t remember what they are about :)
The numbers below (behind | ahead) are according to the current stable pharo9 branch.

- headless has already the new tree organisation with cmake
- dev-7 ��and pharo branches have the old tree organisation, dev-7 has some bugfixes when comparing to `pharo`
- Cog has the original imported version from monticello
Maybe we can have some naming convention for branches?
��- pharo-[version] to denote major development version branches
��- feat/[feature] for feature branches if needed
Then the four above should be renamed accordingly. Something on the lines of...
����
��- Cog -> rename as pharo-0?
��- pharo -> can be removed
��- dev-7 -> pharo-1
��- headless -> pharo-2
?
G
_______________________________________________