On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:41 AM, laurent laffont wrote:

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:

On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:30 AM, laurent laffont wrote:

...

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Miguel Moquillon <miguel.moquillon@gmail.com> wrote: Le 13/06/2011 17:57, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :

On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Miguel Moquillon wrote:

Ok,

I will extend SUnit to integrate my extensions. (It is unfortunate because there is just only one or two methods to change.)

so be ready that your code will not work when the next version of Sunit show up. I really think that this is better to fork one version where we can do what we want. Thus I have two possible solutions: - provide a direct contribution to the SUnit project with my code, - or fork SUnit to a new project (PharoUnit?) so that anybody can enhance the unit test framework for Pharo.

In fact, I don't know if the Pragma implementation in Pharo is specific to the Squeak/Pharo smalltalk dialect. In that case, I think it would be better to fork SUnit as my changes will be based upon pragmas.

Indeed http://squeaksource.com/SUnit is global Read / Write, creator/admin = Marcus Denker, so I suppose you can submit a package/branch in this repo safely.

But keep in mind that the SUnit from Pharo is not regularly saved there... maybe it should? But than, without automatisation this is too much work.

ok. Miguel, the right process may be: - fork SUnit in your own repo.

You can use the existing repo for that... no problem. -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.