Re: [Pharo-users] Where do we go now ?
On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:26, Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote:
From: Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Where do we go now ? Date: 13 April 2018 at 11:26:09 CEST To: Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> Reply-To: Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@yahoo.com>
BTW, why put an .exe installer for Windows available when it crashes right from the start? It just doesn't work at all. Period. For everyone.
And I thought looking for senders of a method was something we mastered a long time ago, like starting with Smalltalk-76. Am I supposed to assume that everything, even basic functionalities, are all broken because it's labeled "alphaâ ?
We have already a issue tracker entry with a description of a fix: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21518/New-Traits-brings-wrong-behaviour-to... <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21518/New-Traits-brings-wrong-behaviour-to...> TODO: turn that description into code and make a Pull Request. Marcus
With new Traits we have some issues which we are slowly fixing. Nice thing that fixes are quite simple and clean and covered by tests. I guess it was not like that before. So Pablo did very good job here. For this concrete case with implementors there is already issue 21652 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21652/Smalltalk-allClassesAndTraits-duplic...>: the method allClassesAndTraits includes traits twice. 2018-04-13 11:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:
On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:26, Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users < pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote:
*From: *Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@yahoo.com> *Subject: **Re: [Pharo-users] Where do we go now ?* *Date: *13 April 2018 at 11:26:09 CEST *To: *Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> *Cc: *Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> *Reply-To: *Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@yahoo.com>
BTW, why put an .exe installer for Windows available when it crashes right from the start? It just doesn't work at all. Period. For everyone.
And I thought looking for senders of a method was something we mastered a long time ago, like starting with Smalltalk-76. Am I supposed to assume that everything, even basic functionalities, are all broken because it's labeled "alphaâ ?
We have already a issue tracker entry with a description of a fix:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21518/New-Traits-brings- wrong-behaviour-to-tagsForMethods
TODO: turn that description into code and make a Pull Request.
Marcus
participants (2)
-
Denis Kudriashov -
Marcus Denker