Aconcagua Canonical Repo(s)
It seems that this is now canonical: https://github.com/ba-st/aconcagua I assume its predecessor [1] was a port from this StHub repo [2]. There are two other repos on StHub [3] - the first of which has changes after the last in [1] and the other has changes which may have been/need to be merged. Can anyone shed further light? 1. https://github.com/mtaborda/aconcagua 2. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~maxi/Aconcagua 3. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~HernanWilkinson/Aconcagua http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~BenoitAstruc/Aconcagua p.s. IMHO when porting from MCZ to GH, a good practice is to state in the GH README that it's a port, including the URL of the source and a way to clarify the last commit (maybe the date could often be sufficient) ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
To slightly further complicate matters, canonical does not quite have all commits from its predecessor. ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
What is the relation with Units maintained by Zweindenker? On Mon 14 Oct 2019 at 19:13, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
It seems that this is now canonical: https://github.com/ba-st/aconcagua
I assume its predecessor [1] was a port from this StHub repo [2]. There are two other repos on StHub [3] - the first of which has changes after the last in [1] and the other has changes which may have been/need to be merged. Can anyone shed further light?
1. https://github.com/mtaborda/aconcagua 2. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~maxi/Aconcagua 3. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~HernanWilkinson/Aconcagua http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~BenoitAstruc/Aconcagua
p.s. IMHO when porting from MCZ to GH, a good practice is to state in the GH README that it's a port, including the URL of the source and a way to clarify the last commit (maybe the date could often be sufficient)
----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
-- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr
Thanks for pointing out the relationship. I had actually been looking for an implementation of the old OOPSLA paper intermittently over a few months. Never would have occurred to me that this is one.  The curse of coy package names... On 15/10/2019 3:50, Cyril Ferlicot wrote:
What is the relation with Units maintained by Zweindenker?
On Mon 14 Oct 2019 at 19:13, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com <mailto:sean@clipperadams.com>> wrote:
It seems that this is now canonical: https://github.com/ba-st/aconcagua
I assume its predecessor [1] was a port from this StHub repo [2]. There are two other repos on StHub [3] - the first of which has changes after the last in [1] and the other has changes which may have been/need to be merged. Can anyone shed further light?
1. https://github.com/mtaborda/aconcagua 2. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~maxi/Aconcagua 3. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~HernanWilkinson/Aconcagua http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~BenoitAstruc/Aconcagua
p.s. IMHO when porting from MCZ to GH, a good practice is to state in the GH README that it's a port, including the URL of the source and a way to clarify the last commit (maybe the date could often be sufficient)
----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
-- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr
I don't know if call it canonical. But certainly it is the version the community is maintaining. It's a fork of the mtaborda repo and converted to tonel format. I don't know how it was migrated from Sthub, but it was before any tool for migrating the history existed. I think it must contain all the functionality available in Sthub. Regarding Units package we never made a thorough comparison so I cannot tell the differences. But this package is intended to be usable for things beyond standard units. We're using it for financial measurements besides the physical ones. Hope it helps in clarifying a bit the situation. On Mon, Oct 14, 2019, 14:13 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
It seems that this is now canonical: https://github.com/ba-st/aconcagua
I assume its predecessor [1] was a port from this StHub repo [2]. There are two other repos on StHub [3] - the first of which has changes after the last in [1] and the other has changes which may have been/need to be merged. Can anyone shed further light?
1. https://github.com/mtaborda/aconcagua 2. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~maxi/Aconcagua 3. http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~HernanWilkinson/Aconcagua http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~BenoitAstruc/Aconcagua
p.s. IMHO when porting from MCZ to GH, a good practice is to state in the GH README that it's a port, including the URL of the source and a way to clarify the last commit (maybe the date could often be sufficient)
----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
gcotelli wrote
I don't know if call it canonical. But certainly it is the version the community is maintaining.
That works for me. I guess I'll re-fork from there. Hopefully, some of the other repo owners will speak up as to whether they have useful changes to pick up. ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
participants (4)
-
Cyril Ferlicot -
Gabriel Cotelli -
Markus Stumptner -
Sean P. DeNigris