Hello! As I need to load specific version of Glorp with my fix, and I did not find out how to force-override it in my baseline, I tried to load it post-the-baseline via Gofer: (Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') package: 'Glorp'; version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; load. But it actually looks like this: [see attached bogusgofer.png]. OTOH, after the image loads the tests pass and monticello browser looks like this: [see attached mbloaded127.png]. Am I doing something wrong? I am a bit afraid what is actually loaded / if it won't break b/c of inconsistent state. Herby
Herby VojÄÃk wrote:
Hello!
As I need to load specific version of Glorp with my fix, and I did not find out how to force-override it in my baseline, I tried to load it post-the-baseline via Gofer:
(Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') package: 'Glorp'; version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; load.
But it actually looks like this: [see attached bogusgofer.png].
OTOH, after the image loads the tests pass and monticello browser looks like this: [see attached mbloaded127.png].
Am I doing something wrong? I am a bit afraid what is actually loaded / if it won't break b/c of inconsistent state.
P.S.: Epicea shows "Loading 127 and 129". I only wanted to load 127. ???
Herby
Bump. Can you pls help me with how to load proper version / finding what is wrong here? As shown in replies, it loads two versions (eg. it seems it loads everything it finds in the repo). Herby Herby VojÄÃk wrote:
Hello!
As I need to load specific version of Glorp with my fix, and I did not find out how to force-override it in my baseline, I tried to load it post-the-baseline via Gofer:
(Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') package: 'Glorp'; version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; load.
But it actually looks like this: [see attached bogusgofer.png].
OTOH, after the image loads the tests pass and monticello browser looks like this: [see attached mbloaded127.png].
Am I doing something wrong? I am a bit afraid what is actually loaded / if it won't break b/c of inconsistent state.
Herby
On 12-09-17 21:58, Herby VojÄÃk wrote:
Bump.
Can you pls help me with how to load proper version / finding what is wrong here?
As shown in replies, it loads two versions (eg. it seems it loads everything it finds in the repo).
Herby
Herby VojÄÃk wrote:
Hello!
As I need to load specific version of Glorp with my fix, and I did not find out how to force-override it in my baseline, I tried to load it post-the-baseline via Gofer:
(Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') package: 'Glorp'; version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; load.
But it actually looks like this: [see attached bogusgofer.png].
OTOH, after the image loads the tests pass and monticello browser looks like this: [see attached mbloaded127.png].
Am I doing something wrong? I am a bit afraid what is actually loaded / if it won't break b/c of inconsistent state.
No, it is fine. Telling Gofer package: means prepare to load the latest version, so you give Gofer two versions to load. https://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/gofer Stephan
stephan wrote:
On 12-09-17 21:58, Herby VojÄÃk wrote:
Bump.
Can you pls help me with how to load proper version / finding what is wrong here?
As shown in replies, it loads two versions (eg. it seems it loads everything it finds in the repo).
Herby
Herby VojÄÃk wrote:
Hello!
As I need to load specific version of Glorp with my fix, and I did not find out how to force-override it in my baseline, I tried to load it post-the-baseline via Gofer:
(Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') package: 'Glorp'; version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; load.
But it actually looks like this: [see attached bogusgofer.png].
OTOH, after the image loads the tests pass and monticello browser looks like this: [see attached mbloaded127.png].
Am I doing something wrong? I am a bit afraid what is actually loaded / if it won't break b/c of inconsistent state.
No, it is fine. Telling Gofer package: means prepare to load the latest version, so you give Gofer two versions to load.
Thank you, sir. Changed it to: (Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; load. and now it does exactly what I wanted. Herby
https://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/gofer
Stephan
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Herby VojÄÃk <herby@mailbox.sk> wrote: > Hello! > > As I need to load specific version of Glorp with my fix, and I did not > find out how to force-override it in my baseline, I tried to load it > post-the-baseline via Gofer: > > (Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') > package: 'Glorp'; > version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; > load. > > But it actually looks like this: [see attached bogusgofer.png]. > > OTOH, after the image loads the tests pass and monticello browser looks > like this: [see attached mbloaded127.png]. > > Am I doing something wrong? I am a bit afraid what is actually loaded / if > it won't break b/c of inconsistent state. >From my understanding, loading was right: - underlined in monticello means loaded - bold means not loaded - normal (not bold nor underlined) means ancestor of loaded version So I'd say you have effectively loaded Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127 in your system. Now, why in the progress bar somebody is loading the version 129? I'm not sure, maybe that's the metacello configuration? Or monticello needs that to calculate something with ancestors? Dunno... > > > Herby > -- Guille Polito Research Engineer French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr* <http://www.cnrs.fr> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
Guillermo Polito wrote:
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Herby VojÄÃk <herby@mailbox.sk <mailto:herby@mailbox.sk>> wrote:
Hello!
As I need to load specific version of Glorp with my fix, and I did not find out how to force-override it in my baseline, I tried to load it post-the-baseline via Gofer:
(Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'DBXTalk' project: 'Glorp') package: 'Glorp'; version: 'Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127'; load.
But it actually looks like this: [see attached bogusgofer.png].
OTOH, after the image loads the tests pass and monticello browser looks like this: [see attached mbloaded127.png].
Am I doing something wrong? I am a bit afraid what is actually loaded / if it won't break b/c of inconsistent state.
From my understanding, loading was right: - underlined in monticello means loaded - bold means not loaded - normal (not bold nor underlined) means ancestor of loaded version
So I'd say you have effectively loaded Glorp-HerbyVojcik.127 in your system.
Now, why in the progress bar somebody is loading the version 129? I'm not sure, maybe that's the metacello configuration? Or monticello needs that to calculate something with ancestors? Dunno...
Epicea item has something like "loading versions 127 and 129" in its title, so it probably means it actually loaded both (as they are the only ones being there, it seems it loaded all versions that it found). :-/ Now is it a bug in M*cello or is it me who is doing something wrong?
participants (3)
-
Guillermo Polito -
Herby VojÄÃk -
stephan