Why was and:and:and:and: deprecated?
Dec. 11, 2012
10:13 p.m.
I can't find a neat way to do the same thing. Am I missing something?
Dec. 11, 2012
10:19 p.m.
I personally don't like methods like the above as there are so many combinations; you can just use the one argument version and nest the blocks condition1 and: [ condition2 and: [ condition3 and: [ condition4 ] ] ] etc
I can't find a neat way to do the same thing. Am I missing something?
4979
Age (days ago)
4980
Last active (days ago)
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Chris -
Peter H. Meadows -
Stéphane Ducasse