Re: [Pharo-users] TestRunner and <expectedFailure>
On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 28 July 2011 15:44, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Alex Schenkman wrote:
Hi List,
How can I use <expectedFailure> togehter with the TestRunner. Testrunner shows the number of expectedFailures, but it always zero, even when I decorate with the Pragma.
testShouldFail <expectedFailure> self fail.
We had to disable the pragma because it lead to making running all tests of the image so slow that it took hours to run.
We should look at this again...
for now, you can use the old style of adding a method that returns an array of the selectors...
can you bench it without and with this changeset?
Looks good! Will add a tracker entry. -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
Igor, why do you search up to Object? It should be enough to search to TestCase only. Lukas On 29 July 2011 09:34, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 28 July 2011 15:44, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Alex Schenkman wrote:
Hi List,
How can I use <expectedFailure> togehter with the TestRunner. Testrunner shows the number of expectedFailures, but it always zero, even when I decorate with the Pragma.
testShouldFail    <expectedFailure>    self fail.
We had to disable the pragma because it lead to making running all tests of the image so slow that it took hours to run.
We should look at this again...
for now, you can use the old style of adding a method that returns an array of the selectors...
can you bench it without and with this changeset?
Looks good! Will add a tracker entry.
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
participants (2)
-
Lukas Renggli -
Marcus Denker